What this category's data looks like
This page handles the category of student disciplinary actions and appeal handling. The materials include factual materials of disciplinary violations, disciplinary decision letters, and appeal letters. The factual materials of disciplinary violations are submitted by the investigating department and record the behavior description, date, and signature; the disciplinary decision letter is issued by the reviewing body and states the type of disciplinary action, the clauses relied upon, and the delivery receipt; the appeal letter is submitted by the student and states the request, reasons, and date. The three types of materials are summarized weekly into the progress table, whose fields include record number, name, cause, date, signature status, and handling stage. The update cadence is entry within three working days after the disciplinary decision, and synchronous updating after the appeal is accepted. When the materials enter this function, the factual materials of disciplinary violations serve as the original basis, the disciplinary decision letter serves as the result evidence, and the appeal letter serves as the review trigger condition; together the three support progress records and statistical verification.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the connection configuration of the deployment environment (server side), not by the capability of a model node, and outputs whether the connection is available (service startup result and connection logs). The "Progress Table and Statistical Scope Description" is then completed by the deployment handover and subsequent business processing.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Factual materials of disciplinary violations | Fields include behavior description, occurrence date, and investigator signature; the cause name and date must be consistent with those in the disciplinary decision letter | Verify the name, quantity, date, and signature fields in the materials one by one, and mark missing items |
| Disciplinary decision letter | Fields include type of disciplinary action, clauses relied upon, decision date, and delivery receipt signature; the disciplinary document number must correspond to that in the appeal letter | Compare the decision letter with the appeal letter, and check whether the document number, date, and receipt signature are complete |
| Appeal letter | Fields include appellant, request, reasons, submission date, and receipt record; the disciplinary result must be consistent with that in the decision letter | Check whether the type of disciplinary action and date in the appeal letter and the decision letter match; if a signature is missing, return it |
| Progress table and statistical scope description | The number of records matches the statistical count, the scope is written in the header, and exceptional cases are listed separately with notes | Use one week of records to verify the totals, check whether the scope and exceptions are clearly written, and verify the connection results of MONGODB_URI, REDIS_URL, and PG_URL |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: For the same record, the cause name and date in the factual materials of disciplinary violations and the disciplinary decision letter do not match. Cause: During entry, verification was not performed according to a unified scope, and versions were not synchronized.
- Phenomenon: The appeal letter lacks a receipt record or receipt signature, causing the signature status in the progress table to be empty. Cause: The signature was not supplemented in time during the material circulation process, and the handover was incomplete.
- Phenomenon: After startup, the logs continuously report connection timeouts, and business data and logs are mixed in the same place. Check: The values of the connection variables are inconsistent with the actual database addresses. Logs use the primary database when no separate log database is configured; inspect the actual log destination separately.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: connect once to the main business database, log database, cache, and vector database item by item, verify the connection results in the startup logs, and verify that the values of MONGODB_URI, REDIS_URL, and PG_URL are consistent with the database addresses.
Business test: use one week of records to verify the totals, see whether the scope and exceptions are clearly written, and check whether the number of records matches the statistical count.
- In the deployment environment, verify that the values of the connection variables for the main business database, log database, cache, and vector database are consistent with the database addresses, and check the startup logs to confirm the connection results.
- Use one week of records to verify the progress table totals, check the header scope and exception notes, and verify whether the names, quantities, dates, and signatures of the factual materials of disciplinary violations, disciplinary decision letters, and appeal letters are consistent.