What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the category of university employment contract signing and graduation destination statistics. Materials include employment agreements, graduation destination registration forms, and employer certificates; sources are departmental submissions, employment center consolidation, and employer receipts; the update cadence is weekly recording and monthly verification. Employment agreements provide the signing entity and date, graduation destination registration forms provide the destination category and registration number, and employer certificates provide the acceptance opinion and stamped receipt. When these three types of materials enter the tool invocation node, each serves its own field-source role: agreements and registration forms are used to compare names, quantities, and dates, while employer certificates are used to verify whether signatures and receipts are complete. Field characteristics are multi-material cross-referencing, versions prone to misalignment, and signatures and receipts prone to being missing; each item's criteria and exceptions must be annotated one by one in the progress records.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the tool invocation node in the workflow (the model decides whether to invoke, and the node executes), outputting the tool invocation result (the inputs and returns in the invocation record). The "progress table and statistical criteria description" is then completed by a subsequent AI node or manual verification. The node decides whether to invoke based on the tool description, parameter descriptions, and whether parameters are required. When there are no required parameters, the model may fabricate parameter values; when there are required parameters but the context lacks suitable values, it may not invoke.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Employment agreement | Verify the signing entity name, signing quantity, signing date, and three-party signatures, and compare item by item with the graduation destination registration form | Open the tool node's description field and confirm the description can be understood on its own; test-run with a question missing a required parameter and check the invocation record of toolChoice and functionCall |
| Graduation destination registration form | Verify the destination category, registration number, registration date, and departmental signature, and align the name, quantity, and date with the same record in the employment agreement | Open each parameter configuration one by one and check the two items of description and whether required; check the diamond connectors and node status on the canvas, and confirm the inputs and returns of toolChoice and functionCall |
| Employer certificate | Verify the acceptance opinion, stamped receipt, certificate date, and contact signature, and align the name, quantity, and date with the same record in the registration form | Test-run with a question missing this field and see whether it asks a follow-up question first; check whether the returned result contains values that do not exist in the business materials, and inspect the functionCall return |
| Progress table and statistical criteria description | The header states the statistical criteria and exception notes, and the recorded count matches the statistical count | Use one week's records to verify the totals, compare the fields of the three types of materials item by item, and confirm version synchronization and that signatures and receipts are complete |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the employment agreement and the graduation destination registration form. Cause: the two materials are maintained separately by the department and the employment center, and no item-by-item cross-check was performed.
- Symptom: the employer certificate lacks a signature or receipt but is still counted in the statistics. Cause: receipt collection and progress recording are not synchronized, and missing items are not annotated in the header exceptions.
- Symptom: the model does not invoke the tool and directly gives an answer, and the returned result contains values that do not exist in the business materials. Cause: the tool description or parameter descriptions are unclear, and required parameters are not guided to follow-up questions by the prompt.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: test-run with a question missing a required parameter, check the inputs and returns in the invocation record, confirm whether it asks a follow-up question or invokes according to the description, and check the invocation record of toolChoice and functionCall.
Business test: use one week's records to verify the totals, and see whether the criteria and exceptions are clearly stated.
- Open the tool node's description field, check whether the description can be understood when taken out on its own, and confirm the diamond interface is connected to the target tool.
- Open each parameter configuration one by one, check the two items of description and whether required, and test-run with a question missing a field to see whether it asks a follow-up question first rather than directly fabricating.