What this category's data looks like
This page addresses progress records and statistical verification in vocational school student internship management; the materials come from three categories: internship agreements, internship plans, and internship logs. Agreements contain position, start and end dates, signatures, and receipts; plans contain batch, number of people, and weekly schedule; logs contain daily records, weekly totals, and signatures. The three categories of materials are updated weekly or monthly, and the field characteristic is that multiple materials share the same record's name, quantity, and date, but versions and signature statuses easily diverge. When entering the tool calling and plugin feature, agreements and plans provide the scope and boundaries, logs provide item-by-item records, and the tool node decides whether to call based on the introduction and parameter configuration, with the returned results used for subsequent verification.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the tool calling node in the workflow (the model decides whether to call, and the node executes), outputting the tool call result (the inputs and returns in the call record). The "progress table and statistical scope description" is then completed by a subsequent AI node or manual verification. The node judges whether to call based on the tool introduction, parameter introduction, and whether parameters are required. When there are no required parameters, the model may fabricate parameter values on its own; when there are required parameters but no suitable value in the context, it may not call.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Internship agreement | Whether the fields, dates, and signatures are consistent with the plan | Open the agreement fields and signature section, verify the start and end dates, position name, and receipt, and compare item by item with the plan |
| Internship plan | Whether the batch, number of people, and weekly schedule match the log totals | Verify the plan header scope and weekly schedule, and use one week's log totals to trace back the number of people and batch |
| Internship log | Whether the daily records, weekly totals, and signatures are complete | Verify the log date, quantity, and signature item by item, and check whether they are consistent with the names in the agreement and plan |
| Tool calling node | Whether the introduction, parameter introduction, and whether required are readable | On the canvas, verify the diamond connectors and node status, and run a test with a question missing a required field to observe whether it asks a follow-up question |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the agreement and the log. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately and are not written back according to a unified scope.
- Symptom: The plan version is not synchronized, and the old weekly schedule is still referenced. Cause: After the update, the scope was not synchronized in the tool node introduction and parameters.
- Symptom: The log lacks a signature or receipt, but the totals are still accepted. Cause: Verification only checks the numbers and does not include the signature as a required field in follow-up questions.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Run a test with a question missing a required parameter, verify the inputs and returns in the call record, and confirm whether it asks a follow-up question or calls according to the introduction; at the same time, verify toolChoice, functionCall, and the three items of tool introduction, parameter introduction, and whether required, and see whether the return contains values that do not exist in the materials.
Business test: Use one week's records to verify the totals, see whether the scope and exceptions are clearly stated, whether the number of records and the statistical count match, and whether the header clearly states the scope.
- Open the parameter configuration one by one, verify the introduction and whether required, and run a test with a question missing that field to see whether it asks a follow-up question first rather than fabricating directly.
- On the canvas, verify the diamond connectors and node status, check whether the results of multiple tools connected in series interfere with each other, and confirm that the tokens of the referenced text and the number of array items are recorded separately.