What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of progress records and statistical verification in technical college formal education management. The materials come from three types of ledgers: student registration records, teaching plans, and skills training records, updated weekly or monthly. When the materials enter this feature, they play different roles: student registration records provide the enrolled headcount and registration dates, teaching plans provide course names, week numbers, and class hours, and skills training records provide training items, completion quantities, and signed receipts. Field characteristics center on four items: name, quantity, date, and signature. The same record may have different names, unequal quantities, or misaligned dates across different materials, and signatures or receipts may also be missing. The progress table and statistical scope description must be completed subsequently by downstream AI nodes or manual verification. The tool call node is only responsible for retrieving field values from the materials according to the description and parameters, and does not directly generate business documents or ledgers.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the tool call node in the workflow (the model decides whether to call, and the node executes), outputting the tool call result (the inputs and returns in the call record). The "progress table and statistical scope description" is completed subsequently by downstream AI nodes or manual verification. Based on the tool description, parameter descriptions, and whether parameters are required, the model determines whether to call the tool this time; when there are no required parameters, the model may fabricate parameter values on its own, and when there are required parameters but no suitable values in the context, it may not call.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Student registration records | Whether fields, dates, and signatures match the teaching plans and skills training records | Open the tool node description fields, verify the parameter descriptions and the two items of whether required, run a test with a question missing a required field to see whether it asks first; check the values of toolChoice and functionCall in the call record |
| Teaching plans | Whether course names, week numbers, and class hours are consistent in the progress table and the statistical scope description header | Open each parameter configuration one by one, verify the description and whether required, confirm that the three items of name, quantity, and date are compared one by one with the skills training records, and write discrepancies into the scope description |
| Skills training records | Whether training items, completion quantities, dates, and signed receipts are complete | Verify the diamond connectors and node status on the canvas, confirm that toolChoice and functionCall are connected to the target tool, and list records missing signatures or receipts separately |
| Progress table and statistical scope description | Whether the record count matches the statistical count, the scope is written in the header, and exceptions are clearly stated | Use one week of records to verify the totals, see whether the scope and exceptions are clearly stated, and whether the returned result contains values that do not exist in the business materials |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name and quantity of the same training record do not match between the student registration records and the skills training records. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, the field scope is not unified, and no one-by-one comparison is performed after the tool call returns.
- Symptom: The teaching plan version is not synchronized, and the progress table references old week numbers. Cause: The materials update at different paces, the tool call node retrieves old-version fields according to the description, and subsequent verification does not detect the version difference.
- Symptom: Skills training records are missing signatures or receipts, but the statistics still include them in the totals. Cause: Whether parameters are required does not correspond to the business material fields, the model may fabricate parameter values on its own, and values that do not exist in the materials appear in the returned result.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: run a test with a question missing a required parameter, check the inputs and returns in the call record, and confirm whether it asks a follow-up question or calls according to the description; check whether toolChoice and functionCall are triggered according to the description, and whether the return contains only fields that exist in the materials.
Business test: use one week of records to verify the totals, see whether the scope and exceptions are clearly stated, whether the record count matches the statistical count, and whether the header states the scope.
- Open the tool node description fields, verify whether this description can be understood when taken out alone, and verify the parameter descriptions and the two items of whether required one by one.
- Verify the diamond connectors and node status on the canvas, confirm that
toolChoiceandfunctionCallare connected to the target tool, and whether the results of multiple tools connected in series interfere with each other.