What this category's data looks like
This page addresses progress records and statistical verification in technical college formal education management. The materials include three types: student registration forms, teaching plans, and skills training records. Student registration forms provide student identity, registration date, and class affiliation, and serve as the baseline for the progress denominator; teaching plans give course names, weekly schedules, and assessment milestones, and are used to attach training records to the corresponding weeks; skills training records carry the date, project name, quantity, and signature of each training session, and are the direct source of the progress numerator and statistical totals. When these three types of materials enter the knowledge base retrieval node, each is cited as an original text fragment. The citation output is only responsible for returning the matched passages and source identifiers, and does not undertake field comparison or ledger generation. In terms of update cadence, registration forms are updated by semester registration batch, teaching plans are updated by the version approved at the start of the semester, and training records are updated weekly or by training batch. Field characteristics center on four items: name, quantity, date, and signature. The name must be consistent with the teaching plan, the quantity must be consistent with the training record total, the date must fall within the corresponding week, and the signature and receipt are used to confirm that the record has taken effect. When versions are not synchronized or signatures are missing, the same record will show mismatches in name, quantity, and date across the two materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node. It outputs an array of cited content, each item containing an original text fragment and a source identifier, and the length may be 0. Even if no content is found, the output chain still completes. The progress table and statistical criteria description are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Student registration form | Fields include student name, registration date, class, and signature, and must correspond one by one with the class affiliation in the teaching plan | In the node, check the selected collection and its vector model, then use the citation markers to point back to the original passage in the registration form |
| Teaching plan | Fields include course name, weekly schedule, and assessment milestones, and must match the project name and date in the skills training records | Open the search parameter panel and check each item. If the cited fragment does not match the original text, first check the materials matched in this round |
| Skills training record | Fields include training date, project name, quantity, and signature, and must be consistent with the weeks in the teaching plan and the class in the registration form | Run a test query with no matching materials and see that the output is empty while the chain continues, and record the array length |
| Cited content output | The number of returned items is consistent with the matched materials; empty is also normal | Check whether the citation array length corresponds to the matched materials; quoteMaxToken is recorded separately only as the citation content budget |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same training record do not match between the registration form and the training record. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, and fields and dates are not checked against a unified standard.
- Symptom: The teaching plan has been updated, but the training record still cites the old version's weeks. Cause: The versions are not synchronized, and the cited fragment comes from the old original text without a version label.
- Symptom: A training record lacks a signature or receipt but is still counted in the total during statistics. Cause: The signature and receipt were not included in the verification as conditions for the record to take effect.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: ask a question with original-text support and check whether the citation array and markers can point back to the original text; then ask a question with no matching materials, confirm that the array is empty while the chain completes, and record the array length separately.
Business test: use one week of records to verify the total and see whether the criteria and exceptions are clearly stated.
- In the conversation, open the citation markers, compare them against the source documents, check item by item whether the cited fragments match the original passages, and inspect the citation information in
responseData(non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) andquoteList. - Open the search parameter panel and check each value item by item, confirm that the associated knowledge base uses the same vector model, and run a test query with no matching materials to confirm that the empty-array chain completes.