What this category's data looks like
The organization of vocational college skills competitions involves three types of materials: competition regulations, registration forms, and training plans. Competition regulations come from official documents issued by the organizers, containing event names, dates, groups, and signature fields; registration forms are filled out by each participating team, containing contestant names, ID numbers, competition events, supervising teachers, and team leader signatures; training plans are formulated by supervising teachers, containing training stages, weeks, daily content, stage goals, and signatures. When these three types of materials enter the tool calling node, their roles differ: competition regulations serve as the baseline for standards, registration forms serve as the source of records, and training plans serve as the basis for progress. The update rhythm is centralized submission before the competition, daily records during the competition, and summary verification after the competition. Field characteristics are that the same record may have inconsistent names, quantities, and dates across the regulations, registration forms, and training plans, versions are not synchronized, and signatures or receipts are missing.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the tool calling node in the workflow (the model decides whether to call, and the node executes), outputting the tool call results (the inputs and returns in the call records). The "progress table and statistical standards description" is completed subsequently by AI nodes or manual verification. The model determines whether to call the tool this time based on the tool introduction, parameter introduction, and whether parameters are required; when there are no required parameters, the model may fabricate parameter values on its own, and when there are required parameters but no suitable values in the context, it may not call.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Competition regulations | Whether fields, dates, and signatures are consistent with the registration forms and training plans | Open the tool node introduction fields, verify the parameter introduction and whether they are required; run a test with a question missing a signature field to see whether it asks first; check the values of toolChoice and functionCall in the call records |
| Registration forms | Whether the names, quantities, and dates of the same record match the competition regulations and training plans | Open each parameter configuration one by one, verify the introduction and whether it is required; verify the diamond connectors and node status on the canvas; confirm whether toolChoice and functionCall are called as introduced |
| Training plans | Whether versions are synchronized and signatures or receipts are complete | Run a test with a question missing a required field to see whether it asks first; verify the inputs and returns in the call records; check whether toolChoice and functionCall appear in the call records |
| Progress table and statistical standards description | Whether the number of records matches the statistical numbers and whether the standards are written in the header | Use one week of records to verify the totals and see whether the standards and exceptions are clearly stated; verify whether the inputs and returns in the call records are consistent with the business materials |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record do not match between the competition regulations and the registration forms. Cause: The two materials are filled out separately, without field-level verification and version synchronization.
- Phenomenon: Training plan versions are not synchronized, and old and new versions circulate at the same time. Cause: The update rhythm is daily records during the competition, but version numbers and effective dates are not marked.
- Phenomenon: Registration forms or training plans lack signatures or receipts. Cause: Whether parameters are required does not correspond to the fields in the business materials, and the model may call directly without asking.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: Run a test with a question missing required parameters, verify the inputs and returns in the call records, and confirm whether it asks first or calls as introduced; also check whether toolChoice and functionCall appear in the call records.
Business test: Use one week of records to verify the totals and see whether the standards and exceptions are clearly stated.
- Open the tool node introduction fields, check whether this description can be understood when taken out alone, and verify the parameter introduction and whether it is required.
- Verify the diamond connectors and node status on the canvas, and confirm that the diamond interface is connected to the target tool.