What this category's data looks like
This page centers on the review of registration for professional and technical personnel vocational qualification examinations, and consolidates three types of materials: registration forms, academic qualification certificates, and work experience certificates. The registration form is filled in by the applicant and includes name, ID number, examination subjects, work unit, and date and signature; the academic qualification certificate is issued by the graduating institution and includes school name, major, graduation date, and certificate number; the work experience certificate is issued by the employer and includes employer name, position, start and end dates, and handler's signature. Materials enter by batch, and each batch corresponds to one registration cycle. The update cadence is a consolidated summary once within one week after the registration deadline, and supplementary documents are appended item by item according to the receipt time. When the three types of materials enter this function, their roles differ: the registration form serves as the main record, while the academic qualification certificate and work experience certificate serve as supporting attachments, used to check whether the name, quantity, and dates of the same record are consistent, and whether signatures and receipts are complete. Field characteristics are concentrated in date formats, full and abbreviated unit names, certificate numbers, and name spellings, and the source and exceptions must be annotated column by column in the progress table and statistical scope description.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the tool invocation node in the workflow (the model decides whether to invoke, and the node executes), outputting the tool invocation result (the input parameters and return in the invocation record). The "progress table and statistical scope description" is then completed by a subsequent AI node or manual verification. Based on the tool description, parameter descriptions, and whether parameters are required, the model determines whether to invoke the tool this time.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Registration form | Whether the fields, dates, and signature match the academic qualification certificate and work experience certificate | Compare name, ID number, examination subjects, and dates item by item, check whether signatures and receipts are complete, and record discrepant entries |
| Academic qualification certificate | Whether the school name, major, graduation date, and certificate number are consistent with the registration form | Look up the corresponding row in the registration form by certificate number, check name spelling and date format, and mark entries whose versions are not synchronized |
| Work experience certificate | Whether the employer name, position, start and end dates, and handler's signature are consistent with the registration form | Check the registration form by full employer name and start and end dates, inspect entries missing signatures or receipts, and write exception notes |
| Tool invocation node | Whether the tool description, parameter descriptions, and whether required correspond to the business material fields | On the canvas, check the diamond connectors and node status, run a trial with a question missing a required parameter, and inspect the invocation record of toolChoice and functionCall |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name and date of the same record do not match between the registration form and the academic qualification certificate. Cause: The two materials are filled in separately, no lookup is performed by certificate number, and versions are not synchronized.
- Phenomenon: The work experience certificate is missing the handler's signature or receipt. Cause: Materials are appended by batch, and supplementary documents are not checked item by item for signature and receipt status.
- Phenomenon: Values that do not exist in the business materials appear in the returned result. Cause: When there are no required parameters, the model may fabricate parameter values on its own without asking first.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: run a trial with a question missing a required parameter, check the input parameters and return in the invocation record, and confirm whether it asks a follow-up question or invokes according to the description; at the same time, inspect toolChoice and functionCall, and check the three items: tool description, parameter descriptions, and whether required.
Business test: use one week of records to check the totals, and see whether the scope and exceptions are clearly written; the number of quoted items is the array length, and quoteMaxToken is the budget for quoted content. The two are not compared for equality; check the tokens of the quoted text, and record the array item count separately.
- Open the description field in the tool node and check whether this description can be understood when taken out on its own; open the parameter configurations one by one, and check the two items: description and whether required.
- Run a trial with a question missing that field, and see whether it asks a follow-up question first instead of fabricating directly; on the canvas, check the diamond connectors and node status, and confirm that it is connected to the target tool.