What this category's data looks like
The main materials for progress records and statistics verification of enterprise compliance and safety training are three types: compliance training courseware, safety operating procedures, and exam records. Courseware is usually updated by batch and includes chapter numbers, applicable positions, and release dates; for operating procedures, the version number and effective date are the key fields, with an attached acknowledgment section; exam records carry personnel identifiers, exam paper versions, scores, and signatures or receipts. When these three types of materials enter the user selection node, their roles differ: courseware and procedures serve as the baseline for progress comparison, while exam records serve as proof of completion. The update rhythm is that courseware is revised quarterly, procedures are replaced by revision notice, and exam records are archived by session. Field characteristics are concentrated in four items: name, quantity, date, and signature. If the name or quantity of the same record does not match across two materials, the version is not synchronized, or a signature or receipt is missing, the progress table and the statistical scope statement will lose the basis for verification.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction status records. The "progress table and statistical scope statement" is completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branch. When the node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow status; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance training courseware | Whether the courseware name, chapter number, release date, and applicable positions match item by item, and whether the progress scope is written in the header | Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, trigger once, and then view the node status in the run record |
| Safety operating procedures | Whether the version number and effective date are synchronized, whether the acknowledgment section and receipt are complete, and whether the old version has been marked as obsolete | Reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node and run a trial once, checking the variables values and branch direction |
| Exam records | Whether the personnel identifier, exam paper version, score, and signature are consistent with the courseware batch and procedure version | Use nodeId to locate the node, check whether the same session repeatedly enters the interaction, and verify that the record count and statistical count add up |
| Progress table and statistical scope statement | Whether the record count and statistical count match, and whether the scope and exceptions are written in the header | Summarize one week of records according to the branch direction, and verify the totals and exception notes |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name and quantity of the same training session do not match between the courseware list and the exam records. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, are not aligned by the same batch number, and the statistical scope is not written in the header.
- Phenomenon: The operating procedure has already been replaced with a new version, but the progress table still counts completion according to the old version. Cause: The version is not synchronized, the node branch still follows the old option, and subsequent nodes do not re-verify according to the new version.
- Phenomenon: The exam record lacks a signature or receipt, but the statistical count still includes it as completed. Cause: The scope conflates sign-in with signature, exceptions are not listed separately, and valid records cannot be distinguished from records pending supplementation during verification.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: run trials option by option, check the branch direction and interaction status in the run record, and confirm that each option corresponds to one branch and that the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes.
Business test: use one week of records to verify the totals, see whether the scope and exceptions are clearly written, and whether the record count and statistical count match.
- Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, trigger once, and then view the node status in the run record to confirm that the process continues downward after the interaction is completed.
- Reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node and run a trial once, use
nodeIdto locate the node, and check whether the same session repeatedly enters the interaction.