What this category's data looks like
The progress records and statistical verification for self-funded study abroad application services revolve around three types of materials: study abroad service contracts, school application forms, and personal statements. The contract provides the signing date, scope of services, and signature field; the application form carries the school name, application round, and submission date; the personal statement records the version number, revision date, and final signature. The material sources are the progress tables summarized weekly by the service team, school receipts, and document version records, with updates on a weekly basis and incorporated into the monthly report at month-end. When entering workflow orchestration, the contract serves as the baseline for definitions, the application form serves as the source for quantities and dates, and the personal statement serves as the object for version synchronization. The fields of the three correspond row by row in the progress table, the statistical definitions are written in the header, and exceptional cases are listed separately in remarks.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction state records. The "progress table and statistical definition description" is continued and completed by subsequent nodes according to the branch. When the user selection node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow state; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Study abroad service contract | Whether the signing date, scope of services, and signature field are consistent with the progress table registration | Check the contract fields against the progress table header definitions one by one, check whether signatures and receipts are complete, and confirm the node status corresponding to nodeId in the run record |
| School application form | Whether the school name, application round, and submission date match the contract and progress table | Extract application form records weekly, check the three columns of name, quantity, and date, and when inconsistencies are found, write the exceptions in the remarks column |
| Personal statement | Whether the version number, revision date, and final signature are synchronized to the latest version | Compare the version records with the progress table, check whether signatures or receipts are missing, and reference variables in subsequent nodes to verify that the selection result variable has been passed in |
| Weekly record total | Whether the weekly record count matches the statistical count, and whether the definitions are written in the header | Add up the weekly records row by row, check the total against the statistical definition description, and list exceptions separately |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The school name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the contract and the application form. Cause: The two materials are registered separately and are not checked row by row under a unified definition.
- Phenomenon: The personal statement version is not synchronized, and the progress table still shows the old version number. Cause: The version record was not written back after modification, and subsequent nodes continue execution along the old branch.
- Phenomenon: The contract or application form lacks a signature or receipt, but the progress table marks it as submitted. Cause: After the interaction is completed, the original materials are not checked, and the branch direction is disconnected from the record status.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: run through each option, check the branch direction and interaction state in the run record, confirm that each option corresponds to one branch, and check the reference results of nodeId and variables in subsequent nodes.
Business test: use one week of records to check the total, see whether the definitions and exceptions are clearly written, and confirm that the record count matches the statistical count and the definitions are written in the header.
- In the user selection node, check the options and branch connections one by one, and after triggering once, view the node status and branch direction in the run record.
- Reference the selection result variable in subsequent nodes and run once, use one week of records to check the total, and write exceptional cases into the header remarks.