What this category's data looks like
The materials for general college entrance examination registration qualification review include the college entrance examination registration form, household registration and student status certificates, and materials for children accompanying migrating parents. The college entrance examination registration form comes from the candidate's online submission and is printed and signed, containing name, candidate number, household registration place, student status school, examination category, and signature field, and is updated centrally during the registration cycle. The household registration and student status certificates are issued separately by the household registration place and the school attended, containing household registration address, date of move-in, start and end of student status, and handler's signature. The materials for children accompanying migrating parents include the parents' residence permit, social insurance payment records, proof of stable residence, and review receipt, and are updated through weekly supplementary submissions. When the three types of materials enter this function, the college entrance examination registration form serves as the main record providing identity and examination registration fields, while the household registration and student status certificates and the materials for children accompanying migrating parents serve as supporting evidence providing date and signature fields, used to check item by item whether names, quantities, and dates are consistent.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the tool calling node in the workflow (the model decides whether to call, and the node executes), outputting the tool call result (the input parameters and return in the call record). The "progress table and statistical scope description" is then completed by a subsequent AI node or manual verification. Based on the tool introduction, parameter introduction, and whether parameters are required, the model determines whether to call the tool this time.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| College entrance examination registration form | Check whether name, candidate number, household registration place, examination category, and signature field are complete, and whether the name and date are consistent with the household registration and student status certificates | Compare the names, quantities, and dates of the two materials item by item; those missing signatures or receipts are recorded as exceptions |
| Household registration and student status certificates | Check whether the household registration address, date of move-in, start and end of student status, and handler's signature match the corresponding fields in the college entrance examination registration form | Check whether the versions are synchronized; for inconsistent dates, mark the source and differences |
| Materials for children accompanying migrating parents | Check the fields, dates, and signatures of the parents' residence permit, social insurance records, proof of stable residence, and review receipt | Use one week's records to check the totals, and see whether the scope and exceptions are clearly stated |
| Tool calling node | Check whether the three items of tool introduction, parameter introduction, and whether required correspond to the material fields | Run a trial with a question missing required parameters, see whether it asks follow-up questions or calls according to the introduction, and check toolChoice, functionCall, and the call record |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same candidate's name or date does not match between the college entrance examination registration form and the household registration and student status certificates. Cause: The two materials are filled in separately, no field-by-field comparison is made, and the versions are not synchronized.
- Phenomenon: The materials for children accompanying migrating parents lack the handler's signature or review receipt, and the recorded number does not match the statistical number. Cause: The materials are supplemented weekly, the scope is not written into the header, and exceptions are not recorded separately.
- Phenomenon: Values that do not exist in the business materials appear in the returned results, and after multiple tools are chained, the results interfere with each other. Cause: The model fabricates parameters based on the introduction without asking follow-up questions first.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: Run a trial with a question missing required parameters, check the input parameters and return in the call record, confirm whether it asks follow-up questions or calls according to the introduction, and check toolChoice, functionCall, and the tool calling node connections.
Business test: Use one week's records to check the totals, and see whether the scope and exceptions are clearly stated
- Open the parameter configurations one by one, and check the two items of parameter introduction and whether required, corresponding to fields that actually exist in the materials
- On the canvas, check the diamond interface connections and node status, and confirm that they are connected to the target tool