What this category's data looks like
This page addresses progress records and statistics verification in adult college entrance examination registration and admission management. The materials come from three category materials: the adult college entrance examination registration form, care bonus point materials, and the admission roster. The registration form records the candidate's basic information and registration serial number, the care bonus point materials record bonus point items and review conclusions, and the admission roster records the admission batch and major. The three materials are produced by different stages, and their update rhythm advances with the registration, review, and admission stages. Field characteristics center on names, quantities, dates, and signatures: the same candidate's name, ID number, bonus point value, and admission date must be consistent across different materials, and signatures and receipts must be complete. When the materials enter this function, the registration form provides the basic records, the care bonus point materials provide the review basis, and the admission roster provides the final result; together, the three support the verification of the progress table and the statistics scope description.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the HTTP node in the workflow, which outputs the response body, status code, and returned fields. The "progress table and statistics scope description" is parsed from the response by subsequent nodes, or handled externally according to the agreement to complete the rest. The request URL and path parameters, request headers, and request body can all use variable placeholders, and the variables come from global variables, system variables, or the output of preceding nodes.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Adult college entrance examination registration form | The registration form fields, registration date, and candidate signature are complete, and the name and ID number of the same record are consistent between the registration form and the admission roster | In the request preview, view the complete rendered URL, and check the correspondence between the registration form fields and the returned fields |
| Care bonus point materials | The bonus point item, value, review date, and reviewer signature are complete, and the name and quantity of the same bonus point record are consistent between the care bonus point materials and the admission roster | Check the request header names and the sources of their values, and use one sample request to compare the returned bonus point fields |
| Admission roster | The admission batch, major, admission date, and responsible person's signature are complete, and the version is synchronized with the registration form and care bonus point materials | In the variables panel, check the source of each placeholder, and confirm the field mapping between variables and responseData |
| HTTP request output | The response body, status code, and returned fields can be traced to specific sources, and Authorization is passed in according to the external system's requirements | Use one sample request to compare the response, and check whether the status code and returned fields are consistent with the agreement |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name and ID number of the same candidate do not match between the registration form and the admission roster. Cause: The two materials are entered at different stages, and field-level comparison and version synchronization were not performed.
- Symptom: The bonus point value in the care bonus point materials is inconsistent with the quantity recorded in the admission roster. Cause: After the review conclusion was updated, it was not written back, and the material versions were not synchronized.
- Symptom: The registration form or admission roster lacks a signature or receipt. Cause: The material circulation stage did not collect signatures as agreed, and receipt completeness was not checked during archiving.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: preview the rendered request, check the status code and returned fields, then compare the result against one sample, and confirm that the placeholder sources for Authorization, variables, and responseData are traceable.
Business test: use one week of records to check the totals, see whether the scope and exceptions are clearly stated, confirm that the record count and statistics count match, and write the scope in the header.
- In the request preview, view the complete rendered URL, and check that the path parameter placeholder variables can be resolved into actual values.
- In the variables panel, check the source of each placeholder, and confirm that the request body fields are consistent with the external interface agreement.