What this category's data looks like
This category's data looks like Research achievement registration and intellectual property management involve three types of materials: achievement registration forms, patent disclosure documents, and software copyright materials. Achievement registration forms come from progress records submitted weekly by research groups, with fields including achievement name, contributors, date, and signature field; patent disclosure documents are written by inventors, containing the technical solution, intended application type, and inventor signature; software copyright materials include source code listings, specifications, and copyright holder seal. The three types of materials have different update rhythms: registration forms roll weekly, disclosure documents are submitted at project milestones, and software copyright materials are frozen by version. When entering this function, registration forms serve as the progress record draft, while disclosure documents and software copyright materials serve as verification references, used to compare whether the name, quantity, and date of the same achievement are consistent across the two materials, and to check whether signatures or receipts are complete.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the tool invocation node in the workflow (the model decides whether to invoke, the node executes), outputting the tool invocation result (the inputs and returns in the invocation record). The "progress table and statistical scope description" is then completed by subsequent AI nodes or manual verification. The model judges whether to invoke the tool this time based on the tool introduction, parameter introduction, and whether parameters are required; when there are no required parameters, the model may fabricate parameter values on its own, and when there are required parameters but no suitable values in the context, it may not invoke.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Achievement registration form | Fields include achievement name, contributors, date, and signature field, and must be aligned item by item with the disclosure document | Open the tool node introduction fields and check whether the description can be understood on its own; run a test with a question missing the contributor to see whether it asks a follow-up first |
| Patent disclosure document | The technical solution, intended application type, and inventor signature must be consistent with the registration form's name, quantity, and date | Open each parameter configuration one by one and verify the parameter introduction and whether it is required; check the diamond connector and node status on the canvas |
| Software copyright materials | The source code listing, specifications, and copyright holder seal must be version-synchronized, with no missing signature or receipt | Run a test with a question missing the seal date to see whether the model asks a follow-up instead of fabricating directly; verify the functionCall return |
| Tool invocation node connection | The diamond interface is connected to the target tool, and the node status is consistent with the canvas | Check the diamond connector and node status on the canvas, and confirm the input sources of toolChoice and functionCall |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same achievement do not match between the registration form and the disclosure document. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, without field-level comparison and version synchronization.
- Symptom: The software copyright material version is not synchronized, and the dates of the source code listing and specifications are inconsistent. Cause: After version freeze, it was not written back to the registration form, so there is no reference during verification.
- Symptom: The disclosure document lacks the inventor signature or the registration form lacks a receipt. Cause: The signature field was not set as a required parameter, and the model directly invokes the tool according to the introduction.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this function: run a test with a question missing a required parameter, check the inputs and returns in the invocation record, and confirm whether it asks a follow-up or invokes according to the introduction; at the same time, verify toolChoice, functionCall, and the tool invocation node connection status.
Business test: use one week of records to verify the totals and see whether the scope and exceptions are clearly stated; align the name, quantity, and date of the registration form, disclosure document, and software copyright materials item by item, and ensure signatures and receipts are complete.
- Open the tool node introduction fields and check whether this description can be understood when taken out on its own, and verify the parameter introduction and whether it is required.
- Run a test with a question missing that field to see whether it asks a follow-up first instead of fabricating directly; check the diamond connector and node status on the canvas.