What this category's data looks like
This page addresses abnormality tracing and manual review for kindergarten play activity organization. The materials come from observation records, area plans, material placement lists, activity objective tables, and reflection-to-next-week plans. Observation records and area plans are updated weekly, material placement quantities are registered daily by area, activity objective achievement is filled in on the same day after the activity, and reflection-to-next-week plans are summarized at the weekend. When the materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompts feature, observation records serve as the source evidence, area plans serve as the corresponding basis, material placement quantities serve as the baseline for verification, activity objective tables serve as the achievement determination, and reflection-to-next-week plans serve as the closed-loop destination. Field characteristics include area name, material name, placement quantity, objective item, observation description, abnormality description, and reviewer signature. The abnormality list and review conclusions are answered by the model based on these, and the external entry point and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, and outputs the reference range of historical messages and answer constraints. Memory turns control how many previous turns of dialogue are referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, the preceding context cannot be used; if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases. The "abnormality list and review conclusions" are then completed by the model.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Memory turns | Matches the range of preceding context required by the question | Check the current value in the application settings, and run a trial with two consecutive questions to confirm that the second round correctly inherits the reference from the first round. The message body is carried by messages, and the session identifier uses chatId |
| Observation records and area plans | Observation records correspond to area plans, and when materials are insufficient or objectives do not match observations, the source material can be traced | Compare area name, material placement quantity, and objective item one by one, attach abnormal records to the corresponding observation record, and pass variables via variables |
| Material placement quantity | Material placement quantity is consistent with the area plan registration | Check the material name and placement quantity for each area; when the quantity is insufficient, mark it as abnormal and attach the original registration |
| Reflection-to-next-week plan | The reflection-to-next-week plan has been updated and corresponds to this week's abnormalities | Check whether the plan has been updated; if not, include it in the abnormality list and hand it to the person in charge for handling |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The material placement quantity is less than the area plan registration, and the activity cannot be carried out according to the objectives. Cause: Insufficient materials were not marked in the observation records, so the source material cannot be found during abnormality tracing.
- Phenomenon: Activity objective achievement is inconsistent with the observation record description. Cause: The objectives do not match the observations, and during review only the conclusion is seen, not the original record.
- Phenomenon: The reflection-to-next-week plan still uses last week's content. Cause: The plan was not updated, and the abnormality list and review conclusions cannot close the loop into next week's arrangements.
How to verify the setup
This feature acceptance: ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question inherits the reference from the first question, and confirm that the memory turns value matches the range of preceding context required by the question.
Business test: create an abnormal record, see whether the source material can be traced, and verify that the abnormality is supported by the original record and the reviewer signature.
- Check the current memory turns value in the application settings, compare the usage records of two runs, and confirm that usage changes accordingly after adjusting the turns.
- Check one by one whether observation records correspond to area plans, material placement quantity, activity objective achievement, and reflection-to-next-week plan; hand the abnormality list to the person in charge for handling.