What this category's data looks like
For undergraduate program establishment and dynamic adjustment, the materials come from three documents: the program establishment application form, the talent training plan, and expert demonstration opinions. The program establishment application form records the program name, code, proposed establishment year, and departmental opinion; the talent training plan records the course structure, credits and class hours, and training objectives; the expert demonstration opinions record the demonstration date, list of experts, and conclusion. The materials are updated by academic year or adjustment batch, and the field characteristics are the coexistence of names, quantities, dates, signatures, and version numbers. When entering the anomaly tracing and manual review function, the program establishment application form serves as the source record, the talent training plan serves as process evidence, and the expert demonstration opinions serve as conclusion support; together, the three support the generation of the anomaly list and review conclusion.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, and outputs the historical message range and answer constraints to be referenced. The memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering, and the prompt constrains the answer scope. The "anomaly list and review conclusion" is then completed by the model, while the external entry point and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Memory turns | Matches the preceding context range required by the question | Check the current value in the application settings, and run a trial with two consecutive questions to observe whether the second question inherits the reference from the first question |
| Program establishment application form | Name, quantity, date, and signature are complete, and consistent with the talent training plan | Retrieve the original records of the application form, compare the name, quantity, and date field by field, check the signature and receipt, and trace the source materials |
| Talent training plan | The course structure, credits and class hours match the date and quantity in the expert demonstration opinions | Retrieve the training plan and demonstration opinions, compare the name, quantity, and date of the same record, and check whether the versions are synchronized |
| Expert demonstration opinions | The demonstration date, list of experts, and conclusion are supported by signatures or receipts | Retrieve the original expert demonstration opinions, check the signatures and receipts, and confirm the version correspondence with the application form and training plan |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same program name is written differently in the application form and the training plan. Cause: The two documents are maintained separately, without field-level alignment and version synchronization.
- Phenomenon: The course quantity or credits and class hours do not match between the training plan and the demonstration opinions. Cause: After adjustment, only one document was changed, and the other was not updated in sync.
- Phenomenon: The expert demonstration opinions lack signatures or receipts, and the review conclusion cannot be signed and confirmed. Cause: Signatures were not fully collected during the material circulation process, and the version was not locked.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question inherits the reference from the first question, and check the values of chatId, messages, and variables within the historical message range.
Business test: create an anomaly record, see whether the source material can be traced, and check that the anomaly is supported by original records and signed by the reviewer.
- Check the current value of memory turns in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and confirm that the second question inherits the reference from the first question.
- Retrieve the program establishment application form, talent training plan, and expert demonstration opinions, compare the name, quantity, date, signature, and version field by field, and trace the source of the anomaly.