What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on the student disciplinary and appeal handling category. The material sources are the original case files submitted by the school's student management department, departmental academic affairs offices, and counselors, with updates archived on a rolling basis according to semesters and event milestones. Three types of materials—disciplinary fact materials, disciplinary decision documents, and appeal letters—enter the workflow with different roles: disciplinary fact materials provide the original records and evidence chain, disciplinary decision documents carry the decision basis and effective date, and appeal letters reflect the student's objections and demands. Field characteristics center on name, student ID, disciplinary violation name, quantity, date, signature, and receipt, which must be aligned item by item. After materials enter the workflow, the user selects a node to trigger interaction, the status is recorded and routed to subsequent nodes for continued processing, forming a traceable exception list and review conclusion.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting the branch direction and interaction status records. The "exception list and review conclusion" is completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branch. When this node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and the workflow status is recorded. After the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Disciplinary fact materials | The name, quantity, date, and signature must be aligned item by item with the disciplinary decision document; missing signature or receipt is regarded as an exception | Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, and reference variables and nodeId to locate the source record |
| Disciplinary decision document | The disciplinary violation name, quantity, and date in the decision document must be consistent with the original records; if the version is not synchronized, it must be marked | Trigger an interaction once, view the node status in the run record, and compare the branch direction corresponding to nodeId |
| Appeal letter | The demands and date in the appeal letter must correspond to the receipt of the disciplinary decision document; if the receipt is missing, it must be reviewed | Reference the selection result variables in a subsequent node and run a trial once to verify whether the branch executes according to the option |
| Exception list and review conclusion | Exceptions must be supported by original records, and only after the reviewer's signature is complete can it be handed over to the responsible person for disposition | Create an exception record, trace it back to the source material, and check whether the signature and receipt are complete |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name and quantity of the same record do not match between the disciplinary fact materials and the disciplinary decision document. Cause: The two materials are entered separately, without field-level alignment and version synchronization.
- Phenomenon: The version of the disciplinary decision document is not synchronized, and the old version is still in circulation. Cause: After the update, the interaction status record was not triggered, and subsequent nodes still continue execution according to the old branch.
- Phenomenon: The appeal letter lacks a signature or receipt, and the review conclusion cannot be signed and confirmed. Cause: When the materials were archived, the signature and receipt fields were not verified, and the exception was not marked.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: run trials option by option, check the branch direction and interaction status in the run record, and confirm that variables and nodeId can be referenced in subsequent nodes.
Business test: create an exception record, see whether it can be traced back to the source material, and check whether the name, quantity, date, and signature of the disciplinary fact materials, disciplinary decision document, and appeal letter are aligned.
- Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, trigger an interaction once, and view the node status in the run record.
- Reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node and run a trial once to confirm that the branch executes according to the option and that the exception list can be traced back to the source material.