What this category's data looks like
This page corresponds to the graduate admissions re-examination and admission category. The materials come from three documents: the re-examination plan, the candidate score sheet, and the transfer list. They are updated by admissions year and batch, and the fields include candidate name, ID, preliminary and re-examination scores, transfer destination, date, and signature field. When the materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt feature, the re-examination plan serves as the rule source document, the candidate score sheet serves as the score basis, and the transfer list serves as the circulation voucher. Together, the three support anomaly tracing and manual review. The external entry point and authorization for the anomaly list and review conclusions are handled by the publishing service and file permissions; this feature is only responsible for organizing the historical message scope and answer constraints.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the app settings, and outputs the referenced historical message scope and answer constraints. The anomaly list and review conclusions are then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, prior context cannot be used; if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Re-examination plan | The name, date, and signature field must correspond item by item with the candidate score sheet and transfer list | Check the plan version number and effective date, verify whether signatures or receipts are complete, and use variables to record the version identifier |
| Candidate score sheet | The name, quantity, and date of the same candidate in the two materials must not mismatch | Compare scores and list entries by candidate ID, and use messages to retain the comparison trail |
| Transfer list | Entries missing signatures or receipts must be listed separately and their source marked | Check receipts and signatures, and use chatId to associate dialogue records from the same batch |
| Memory turns | Match the prior context range required by the question | Check the current value in the app settings, and test with two consecutive question turns |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, or date of the same candidate in the score sheet and transfer list does not match. Cause: The two materials were entered separately, and cross-comparison by candidate ID was not performed.
- Symptom: The re-examination plan version is not synchronized, and old rules are still referenced. Cause: After the plan was updated, the version identifier and effective date were not synchronized in the app settings.
- Symptom: Transfer list entries are missing signatures or receipts, and the anomaly cannot be closed. Cause: Receipts were not collected during the circulation step, and the reviewer signature field was left blank.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question inherits the reference from the first, and check the historical scope recorded by messages and chatId.
Business test: Create an anomaly record, see whether the source material can be traced, and confirm that all three materials—the re-examination plan, candidate score sheet, and transfer list—can be traced back.
- Check the current memory turns value in the app settings, and confirm it matches the prior context range required by the question.
- Test with two consecutive question turns, check whether the second turn correctly inherits the reference from the first turn, and compare the usage records of the two runs.