What this category's data looks like
Vocational college program setup filing materials usually include a program setup filing form, talent demand justification, and a faculty and equipment list. The sources are institutional applications, industry research, and internal asset ledgers, updated with application batches. Fields cover program name, enrollment scale, number of teachers, equipment value, justification date, and signature field. The filing form is the master record, the talent demand justification supports necessity, and the faculty and equipment list corroborates the conditions for running the program. When the materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompts feature, the filing form takes the indexing role, while the justification and list serve as the basis for verification, used to compare whether the name, quantity, date, and signature of the same record are consistent, and to trace anomalies back to the source materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the reference historical message range and answer constraints. The anomaly list and review conclusions are then completed by the model, while the external entry point and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Program setup filing form | The program name, enrollment quantity, filing date, and signature field must match the justification and list item by item | Retrieve the original page of the filing form, verify the name, quantity, date, and signature, and record the discrepancy rows |
| Talent demand justification | The justification date and signature receipt are complete, and the same program name matches the filing form | Compare the name and date in the justification and filing form, and check for missing signatures or receipts |
| Faculty and equipment list | The number of teachers, equipment value, and version date are synchronized with the filing form | Verify the list version against the filing form, and mark items whose quantity or date does not match |
| Memory turns | Matches the prior context range required by the question, and the current value is checked in the application settings | Run a trial with two consecutive follow-up questions, check whether the second turn carries forward the reference from the first turn, and record the usage of messages, chatId, and variables |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The program name and enrollment quantity of the same record do not match between the filing form and the talent demand justification. Cause: The two materials were filed separately, without cross-comparison and version synchronization.
- Symptom: The faculty and equipment list version is not synchronized, and the old version's quantities are still referenced. Cause: The update cadence is inconsistent, and version dates and receipt confirmation are lacking.
- Symptom: The filing form lacks a signature or receipt, and the anomaly cannot be traced back to the source materials. Cause: The signature page and receipt record were not retained during material circulation.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question carries forward the reference from the first question, and check the behavior of messages, chatId, and variables within the historical message range.
Business test: create an anomaly record, see whether it can be traced back to the source materials, and confirm that the anomaly is supported by original records and the reviewer's signature.
- Check the current value of memory turns in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive question turns, and confirm that the second turn correctly carries forward the reference from the first turn.
- Compare the usage records of two runs, confirm that consumption changes accordingly after adjusting the number of turns, and check whether the opening message is treated as prior context.