What this category's data looks like
Vocational college program filing materials mainly consist of three types: the program filing form, the talent demand justification, and the faculty and equipment list. Their sources are in-school submissions and competent department receipts, and their update cadence is synchronized with application batches and review checkpoints. Field characteristics center on program name, enrollment number, justification date, and signature and seal positions. When entering the conversation logs and auditing function, the filing form plays the role of the primary record, the talent demand justification plays a supporting role, and the faculty and equipment list plays the role of condition verification; together, the three types of materials form the original evidence chain for exception tracing.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the conversation record interface (by application and session dimension), outputting a session message list and total record count, including role and reference information. The "exception list and review conclusions" are then completed by humans or an external system; the interface only retrieves conversation evidence and does not write to business ledgers.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Program filing form | The program name, enrollment number, filing date, and signature field must correspond item by item with the talent demand justification and the faculty and equipment list | In the request parameters, verify the sources of the two identifiers, application and session; open a single record to verify the role, reference information, and duration fields |
| Talent demand justification | The justification date, industry name, and position count should be consistent across the filing form and the list; if a signature or receipt is missing, it is treated as pending review | Pull two pages in succession and compare the total record count and offset; confirm that the two role types, question and answer, appear alternately in the returned list |
| Faculty and equipment list | The faculty count, equipment name, purchase date, and filing form version should be synchronized; if the name, quantity, or date of the same record does not match across the two materials, mark it as an exception | Use chatId to locate the session, use dataId to locate a single message, and use value to view reference and duration fields |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, or date of the same program does not match between the filing form and the faculty and equipment list. Cause: The two materials are filed separately, no field-level comparison is performed, and versions are not synchronized.
- Symptom: A talent demand justification lacks a signature or receipt but is still circulated as valid material. Cause: The review step did not check the signature field and receipt number, and the exception record was not marked.
- Symptom: The interface returns empty but sessions exist in the UI, or only the first page is retrieved, and exported records lack references. Cause: Pagination parameters and the total count were not compared, and reference fields were not retained during export.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: page through by total record count to retrieve everything, sample one record to verify role, reference information, and time, confirm that response code of 200 matches the total record count total, and record the reference count separately by array length, without comparing it for equality against the reference content budget.
Business test: create an exception record, see whether it can be traced back to the source materials, and verify whether the fields, dates, and signatures of the filing form, talent demand justification, and faculty and equipment list are consistent.
- Use
chatIdanddataIdto locate the session and a single message, verify the role field and reference information, and confirm that message roles correspond to the original conversation. - Pull two pages in succession and compare the total record count and offset, check whether exported records retain reference and duration fields, and if references are missing, fall back and retrieve again.