What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of formulating talent cultivation plans for vocational colleges. The materials include three types: talent cultivation plans, course standards, and job competency analysis tables. The talent cultivation plan is the master outline, the course standard is the course-level basis, and the job competency analysis table is the working draft for competency mapping. The three must remain consistent in program name, number of courses, number of competency entries, dates, and signatures. The materials come from academic affairs system exports and submissions by teaching and research offices, with an update cadence based mainly on academic-year revisions and supplemented by semester-level adjustments. When entering the conversation logs and auditing function, each of the three material types plays an evidentiary role: the talent cultivation plan provides the version and approval chain, the course standard provides course fields and receipts, and the job competency analysis table provides job competency entries and signature fields. Conversation records are retained by application and session dimensions, and are used to trace back which field of which material was cited in a given plan discussion, thereby supporting anomaly tracing and manual review.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is performed by the conversation record interface (by application and session dimensions), which outputs a session message list and the total record count, including role and citation information. The anomaly list and review conclusions are then completed manually or by an external system. The message list is not a version ledger of business materials.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Talent cultivation plan | The plan name, program code, approval date, and signature field must be consistent with the corresponding fields in the course standards and job competency analysis table | Pull the session message list by chatId, verify that the total record count total and response code of 200 are correct, and sample one record to compare the plan name and approval date |
| Course standard | The number of courses, credit hours, and receipt date must match the course fields in the talent cultivation plan | After paging through to retrieve all records, locate a single answer by dataId, and verify the course name and credit hours in the citation information |
| Job competency analysis table | The number of competency entries, job names, and signature field must be cross-consistent with the talent cultivation plan and course standards | Open a record containing value, and verify the number of competency entries and the signature receipt date in the cited text |
| Conversation record interface | The pagination parameters and role fields must make the number of records match the total, with questions and answers appearing alternately | Pull two consecutive pages and compare the offset and total, confirming the order of role fields and the presence of citation and elapsed-time fields |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name and credit hours of the same course do not match between the talent cultivation plan and the course standard. Cause: The two materials were revised separately, versions were not synchronized, and the fields cited in the conversation records come from different versions.
- Symptom: The number of competency entries in the job competency analysis table and the course standard are missing signatures or receipts. Cause: The teaching and research office omitted signatures at submission, and field-level verification was not performed after the materials entered the session.
- Symptom: The interface returns empty but sessions appear in the UI, or only the first page is retrieved. Cause: The sources of the application and session identifiers are inconsistent, and pagination offsets were not pulled continuously, causing the total record count to mismatch.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: page through to retrieve all records by total record count, sample one record to verify the role, citation information, and time, and confirm response code of 200 and that the number of messages matches the total record count.
Business test: create one anomalous record, see whether the source material can be traced, and verify the fields, dates, and signatures of the talent cultivation plan, course standard, and job competency analysis table.
- Use
chatIdand the session identifier to pull two consecutive pages, compare the offset and total record count total, and confirm there are no omissions and the status code is 200. - Open a single record, verify the role field, citation information, and elapsed-time field, and separately record the number of items in the citation array without comparing it for equality with the citation content budget.