What this category's data looks like
Technical college academic education management materials mainly consist of student registration forms, teaching plans, and skills training records. Sources are three-level reporting from admissions and enrollment, academic affairs scheduling, and training workshops. The update rhythm rolls forward by semester registration, monthly teaching progress, and weekly skills training records. Field characteristics center on name, student ID, course name, training item, quantity, date, signature, and receipt. When entering the exception tracing and manual review function, the student registration form assumes the baseline role for identity and program length, the teaching plan assumes the comparison role for course and class hour arrangements, and the skills training records assume the corroborating role for process quantities and signed receipts. The three are filled in item by item by field in the form input node, forming an exception list and review conclusion that can be traced back to source materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the form input node (interaction node) in the workflow, outputting the field values filled in by the user (passed to subsequent nodes after submission). The "exception list and review conclusion" is completed by subsequent nodes or manually afterward. After the form input node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow state. After the user fills in the required items and submits, the form information is passed to subsequent nodes for use.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Student registration form | Whether name, student ID, program length, registration date, and signature are consistent with the teaching plan | Check field names one by one in the node configuration, reference fields with formInputResult, and run a trial |
| Teaching plan | Whether course name, class hour quantity, and start/end dates match the skills training records | Check required settings one by one, select a course with userSelect, and submit for verification |
| Skills training records | Whether training item, quantity, date, signature, and receipt are missing or the version is not synchronized | Reference this field in subsequent nodes and run a trial, tracing back to the original record |
| Exception list and review conclusion | Whether the exception is supported by original records and whether the reviewer has signed | After submission, check the field values obtained by subsequent nodes and hand them to the person in charge for handling |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The course name of the same record does not match between the student registration form and the teaching plan. Cause: The two materials are filled in separately, without field name alignment and version synchronization.
- Phenomenon: The quantity in the skills training records is inconsistent with the class hour quantity in the teaching plan. Cause: Training records are updated on a weekly rolling basis, while the teaching plan has not been revised in sync.
- Phenomenon: The exception list lacks a signature or receipt, and the review conclusion cannot be assigned responsibility. Cause: The required marker does not cover the signature field, and field transmission is not checked after submission.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: fill it out once and submit, check the field values obtained by subsequent nodes, and confirm that formInputResult and selectResult, and required items can all be transmitted.
Business test: create an exception record, see whether it can be traced back to the source materials, and check the dates and signatures in the student registration form, teaching plan, and skills training records.
- Check the form field names one by one against the material fields for one-to-one correspondence, and check whether the required markers cover key material fields.
- Reference the fields in subsequent nodes and run a trial, confirming that the field values can be obtained after submission and that the conversation does not remain in the interactive state.