What this category's data looks like
This category's data mainly consists of competition regulations, registration forms, training plans, and exception lists. Competition regulations are published by the organizer, and their update cadence adjusts with competition event notices; their fields include event name, group, date, and seal. Registration forms are submitted by participating institutions; their fields include contestant name, ID number, competition event, and institution seal. Training plans are filled in by supervising instructors; their fields include phase objectives, training dates, and signature. Exception lists are registered by the system or manually; their fields include exception type, original record number, and review conclusion. When these materials enter this feature, competition regulations serve as the judgment baseline, registration forms and training plans serve as the objects being compared, and exception lists serve as the output carrier, each taking on the roles of source, comparison, and conclusion.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the HTTP node in the workflow, outputting the response body, status code, and returned fields. The exception list and review conclusion are parsed from the response by subsequent nodes, or an external system completes the follow-up according to the agreement. The HTTP node does not replace the external system in writing to the database or approving.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Competition regulations | Whether the event name, group, date, and seal are consistent with the registration form | Check the rendered address and request headers in the request preview, and compare the name and date fields of the regulations and the registration form |
| Registration form | Whether the contestant name, competition event, institution seal, and receipt are complete | Use a sample request to compare the returned fields, and check whether the names and quantities in the registration form and training plan match |
| Training plan | Whether the phase objectives, training dates, and supervising instructor signature are synchronized with the regulations | Check the source of each placeholder in the variables panel, and confirm whether the original record can be traced when the training plan version is not synchronized |
| Exception list | Whether the exception type, original record number, and review conclusion are supported by original records | Check the exception fields returned by responseData, and confirm that the reviewer signature and original material number are traceable |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name and date of the same record do not match between the competition regulations and the registration form. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, without field-level comparison and version synchronization.
- Symptom: The registration form lacks a signature or receipt, and the training plan version is not synchronized. Cause: Material submission and updates do not go through the same set of validation, and an old version overwrites a new version.
- Symptom: The request returns 401 or the external system receives empty fields. Cause: The source of the
Authorizationvalue is not checked, and thevariablesplaceholders are not parsed into actual values.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: preview the rendered request, check the status code and returned fields, then compare one sample result to confirm that the three references Authorization, variables, and responseData are traceable.
Business test: create an exception record, see whether the source material can be traced, and check the reviewer signature and original record number.
- Check the source of each placeholder in the variables panel, and confirm that the request header names and value sources are consistent.
- Use a sample request to compare the response, and check whether the request body fields are consistent with the external interface agreement.