Multi-Turn Conversation and Prompts for Vocational College Skills Competition Organization: Trace Exceptions and Review Results

Skills Competitions: review conversation for exception review. Check source versions, input mappings and the values received by downstream nodes.

What this category's data looks like

Vocational college skills competition organization involves three types of materials: competition regulations, registration forms, and training plans. Competition regulations are issued by the organizer and contain the event name, group, date, and seal; registration forms are submitted by participating teams and contain contestant names, ID numbers, instructors, and receipt signatures; training plans are compiled by the coaching team and contain phase objectives, class hours, and review signatures. The three types of materials update at different rhythms: regulations are adjusted with pre-competition notices, registration forms are corrected with qualification review, and training plans roll forward with preparation progress. When the materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt feature, competition regulations serve as the rule basis, registration forms serve as the source of personnel and quantities, and training plans serve as process evidence. Exception tracing requires comparing the fields, dates, and signatures of the same record across the three materials item by item, forming an exception list and review conclusion, and handing them to the person in charge for handling.

Configuration and implementation checks

This step is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the historical message range and answer constraints for reference. The exception list and review conclusion are then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering; too small a value fails to use prior context, while too large a value brings in irrelevant content and increases consumption.

ObjectCheckVerification action
Competition regulationsThe event name, group, date, and seal must be consistent with the registration form and training planCheck the event name and date in the regulations, compare the corresponding fields in the registration form and training plan, and record differences
Registration formContestant names, quantity, instructors, and receipt signatures must be consistent with the training planCheck the number of people in the registration form against the class hour records in the training plan, and check whether receipt signatures are complete
Training planPhase objectives, class hours, and review signatures must be consistent with the time nodes of the competition regulationsCheck the training plan dates against the competition schedule in the regulations, and check the review signature and version number
Multi-turn dialogue recordIn continuous follow-up questions, the second turn can correctly carry forward the references from the first turnRun a trial with two consecutive question turns, and check how chatId and variables in messages carry forward

Three common errors

  • Symptom: the same contestant name is written differently in the registration form and training plan. Cause: the two materials are entered by different personnel, and no field-level comparison and unification were performed.
  • Symptom: after the competition regulation date is adjusted, the training plan still uses the old version. Cause: versions were not synchronized, and change notices and receipt confirmations were lacking.
  • Symptom: the review conclusion lacks the reviewer's signature or receipt. Cause: the manual review step did not retain signed acknowledgment records, so the exception list cannot be closed.

How to verify the setup

Feature acceptance: ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question carries forward the references from the first question, and check the reference scope of messages, chatId, and variables.

Business test: create an exception record and see whether it can be traced back to the source material.

  • Check the current memory turns value in the application settings, and confirm it matches the prior context range required by the question.
  • Compare the usage records of two runs, and confirm that the run consumption changes accordingly after the turns adjustment.