What this category's data looks like
In filing and implementation, social evaluation for occupational skill level certification generates multiple types of materials: evaluation implementation plans, candidate registration forms, assessor dispatch forms, as well as subsequent examination room records, score summaries, and receipts. These materials come from three parties—the evaluation agency, test sites, and assessors—and are updated by batch. Fields mainly consist of name, ID number, occupation (work type), level, date, signature, and quantity. When the materials enter the anomaly tracing and manual review function, the evaluation implementation plan serves as the rule baseline, while the candidate registration forms and assessor dispatch forms serve as the objects for item-by-item comparison. The fields, dates, and signatures of the three must mutually corroborate. Common inconsistencies are concentrated in the same record having mismatched names, quantities, or dates across two materials, versions not being synchronized, or missing signatures or receipts.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the HTTP node in the workflow, outputting the response body, status code, and returned fields. The "anomaly list and review conclusions" are parsed from the response by subsequent nodes, or handled and completed by an external system according to the agreement. The request URL and path parameters, request headers, and request body can all use variable placeholders, and the variables come from global variables, system variables, or the output of preceding nodes.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation implementation plan | Name, quantity, date, and signature are consistent between the plan and the registration form | Take the occupation (work type), level, and batch date from the plan, compare them item by item with the candidate registration form, and verify the signature and receipt |
| Candidate registration form | The candidate name, ID number, occupation (work type), and level fields can be traced to the original record | In the variable panel, verify the source of each placeholder, and confirm that the variables values correspond to the registration form fields |
| Assessor dispatch form | The assessor name, date, and signature are consistent between the dispatch form and the examination room records | Compare the assessor names and dates in the dispatch form and the examination room records, and check whether the signatures and receipts are complete |
| Request headers and request body | Authentication information is passed in according to the external system's requirements, and the fields are consistent with the external interface agreement | Verify the request header names and value sources, confirm that the Authorization value is correct, and compare the response using a sample request |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same candidate name is written differently in the registration form and the implementation plan, and the quantity and date also do not match. Cause: The two materials were entered separately, without field-level comparison and receipt verification.
- Symptom: The evaluation implementation plan has been updated, but the test site still executes according to the old version. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and material circulation lacked version identification and receipt confirmation.
- Symptom: The assessor dispatch form lacks a signature or receipt, and the anomalous record cannot be attributed. Cause: The signature step was not closed-loop, and the reviewer did not sign to confirm the conclusion.
How to verify the setup
For this function's acceptance: preview the rendered request, check the status code and returned fields, then compare a sample result to confirm that the anomaly list and review conclusion fields in responseData can be parsed.
Business test: create an anomalous record, see whether it can be traced to the source material, and confirm that the anomaly is supported by the original record and the reviewer's signature.
- In the request preview, view the complete rendered address and confirm that the path parameter placeholder variables can be resolved into actual values.
- In the variable panel, verify the source of each placeholder, and confirm that the
variablesandAuthorizationvalues can be traced to specific origins.