What this category's data looks like
This page addresses materials for social evaluation of vocational skill level certification. The core categories are the evaluation implementation plan, candidate registration form, and assessor dispatch form. The material source is the acceptance and archiving stage of the certification body, and the update cadence rolls with batches. Field characteristics center on names, quantities, dates, signatures, and receipts. When entering this function, the evaluation implementation plan plays the role of the process and subject baseline, the candidate registration form plays the role of personnel and qualification details, and the assessor dispatch form plays the role of assessors and attendance records. The three must mutually corroborate on the same anomaly tracing chain; if any field does not match, manual review is triggered.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turn count and prompt configuration in the application settings, and the output references the historical message range and answer constraints. The "anomaly list and review conclusion" is then completed by the model. The memory turn count controls how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, the preceding text cannot be used; if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation implementation plan | The batch, subjects, and dates in the plan must be aligned item by item with the registration form and dispatch form, and signatures and receipts must not be missing | Check the current memory turn count value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive follow-up questions, and check whether the second turn can carry forward the references from the first turn |
| Candidate registration form | The name, quantity, and date of the same candidate in the two materials must be consistent, and the versions must be synchronized | Compare the usage records of two runs, check the change in run consumption after adjusting the turn count, and record the tokens of the quoted text |
| Assessor dispatch form | The assessor attendance records must mutually corroborate with the plan and registration form on dates and signatures; missing signatures or receipts are listed as anomalies | Run a trial with two consecutive question turns, confirm that the opening message is not treated as preceding text, and that reference carryover is correct |
| Anomaly list and review conclusion | Anomalies must be supported by original records, and reviewer signatures must be complete before they can be handed to the person in charge for handling | Trace the source materials corresponding to the anomaly records, and check names, quantities, dates, and signature receipts |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The second question answers off-topic when using references. Cause: The memory turn count is too small, the preceding information is not included in the reference range, and the referenced object is lost.
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match in the two materials. Cause: The versions are not synchronized, the old material has not been replaced, and the fields have not been checked item by item.
- Phenomenon: Responses become slower and consumption rises. Cause: The memory turn count is too large, irrelevant historical messages are brought in, and the quoted content budget is occupied ineffectively.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question carries forward the references from the first; at the same time, check how chatId, messages, and variables are presented in the historical message range, and confirm that the tokens of the quoted text and the number of array entries are recorded separately.
Business test: create an anomaly record, see whether the source material can be traced, and check whether the names, quantities, dates, and signature receipts in the evaluation implementation plan, candidate registration form, and assessor dispatch form are consistent.
- Check the current memory turn count value in the application settings, match it to the preceding text range required by the question, and run a trial with two consecutive question turns to verify reference carryover.
- Compare the usage records of two runs, check the change in run consumption after adjusting the turn count, and confirm that the opening message is not treated as preceding text.