What this category's data looks like
In the exam organization and violation handling scenario, materials are archived into three categories: exam manual, exam room record sheet, and violation fact record. The exam manual provides process nodes and handling permissions, the exam room record sheet carries time, exam room, invigilator, and exception description, and the violation fact record carries candidate information, behavior description, evidence, and signature. Materials come from exam system exports and manual reporting, and the update cadence advances with exam batches. Common fields include record name, quantity, date, signature, and receipt. When materials enter workflow orchestration, the exam manual serves as the branching basis, and the exam room record sheet and violation fact record serve as the original evidence for exception tracing, so that after the user selects a node to trigger interaction, execution continues along the branch.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branch), outputting the branch direction and interaction state record. The "exception list and review conclusion" is then completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution along the branch. When the node is triggered, the conversation enters the interaction state and records the workflow state; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the chosen option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Exam manual | Whether the process nodes, handling permissions, and version date are consistent with the current batch | Check the manual version number and effective date, and compare the process node names referenced by the exam room record sheet |
| Exam room record sheet | Whether the exam room, time, invigilator, and exception description correspond item by item with the violation fact record | Compare name, quantity, and date field by field; mark those missing a signature or receipt as pending supplementation |
| Violation fact record | Whether the candidate information, behavior description, evidence, and signature are complete and traceable | Trace back to the original record sheet number, and check whether the signature and receipt are complete |
| User selection node | Whether each option corresponds to one branch, and whether the selection result variable is passed to subsequent nodes | Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, and after a trial run, inspect the nodeId and variables in the run record |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name and quantity of the same record do not match between the exam room record sheet and the violation fact record. Cause: The two materials are reported at different stages, without field-by-field comparison and receipt confirmation.
- Symptom: The exam manual version is not synchronized, and the branching basis still points to the old process. Cause: After the manual was updated, the node references were not re-checked, and missing dates and signatures were not discovered.
- Symptom: Exception records still enter review despite missing signatures or receipts. Cause: When materials were archived, the signature field and receipt number were not validated, so the source material cannot be located during tracing.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: run a trial for each option, check the branch direction and interaction state in the run record, and confirm that nodeId and variables are correctly referenced by subsequent nodes.
Business test: create an exception record and see whether it can be traced back to the source material.
- Check the fields, dates, and signatures of the exam manual, exam room record sheet, and violation fact record one by one, and mark inconsistent items.
- Check the options and branch connections one by one in the user selection node, and after a trial run, inspect the branch direction and interaction state in the run record.