Forms and User Interaction for Exam Organization and Misconduct Handling: Trace Exceptions and Review Results

Exam Administration: review forms for exception review. Compare the source records, required inputs and downstream results before handing the task over.

What this category's data looks like

In exam organization and violation handling, materials mainly consist of three types: exam administration manuals, examination room record sheets, and violation fact records. Their sources are pre-exam scheduling, during-exam recording, and post-exam consolidation. The update rhythm rolls by exam batch, and field characteristics center on four categories: name, quantity, date, and signature. Exam administration manuals provide rules and process standards; examination room record sheets carry on-site facts and receipts; violation fact records point to specific behaviors and review opinions. When materials enter the form input node, their roles differ: exam administration manual fields are used to verify the rule basis, examination room record sheet fields are used to reconstruct the on-site state, and violation fact record fields are used to lock abnormal entries. Exception tracing requires that each exception can be traced to the original record, while manual review requires the reviewer's signature confirmation. Together, they form the input basis for the exception list and review conclusions.

Configuration and implementation checks

This step is executed by the form input node (interaction node) in the workflow, which outputs the field values filled in by the user (passed to subsequent nodes after submission). The "exception list and review conclusions" are completed by subsequent nodes or manually. After the form input node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow state. After the user fills in the required items and submits, the form information is passed to subsequent nodes for use.

ObjectCheckVerification action
Exam administration manualFields, dates, and signatures must be aligned item by item with the examination room record sheet and violation fact record, and the rule standards must be consistentCheck field names one by one in the node configuration, and confirm that manual entries and record sheet entries point to the same session
Examination room record sheetThe name, quantity, and date of the same record in the manual and the record sheet must be consistent; missing signature or receipt is considered incompleteCheck the required settings one by one, reference the formInputResult field in subsequent nodes and run a trial, and compare the receipt and signature items
Violation fact recordAbnormal entries must be supported by original records, and can only enter handling after the reviewer signsCheck the exception type selected by userSelect and the record sheet number, and confirm that the formInput submitted value can be traced back to the source material

Three common errors

  • Symptom: The name and quantity of the same record do not match between the exam administration manual and the examination room record sheet. Cause: The fields in the two places were not filled according to the same standard, and the versions were not synchronized.
  • Symptom: The violation fact record lacks a signature or receipt, and the reviewer of the abnormal entry cannot be confirmed. Cause: Required items were not marked as required, and empty values were not intercepted on submission.
  • Symptom: After submission, subsequent nodes cannot retrieve the value, and the conversation stays in the interactive state. Cause: The field name does not correspond or the field is not referenced in subsequent nodes.

How to verify the setup

Acceptance of this feature: fill in once and submit, check whether the formInputResult field values retrieved by subsequent nodes are consistent with the filled content, and confirm that the userSelect options correspond to the submitted values.

Business test: create an abnormal record, see whether it can be traced to the source material, and check whether the name, quantity, date, and signature are consistent with the original record.

  • Check field names one by one in the node configuration, and confirm that they correspond one-to-one with the material fields of the exam administration manual, examination room record sheet, and violation fact record.
  • Check the required settings one by one, reference the field in subsequent nodes and run a trial, and confirm that the field value can be retrieved by subsequent nodes after submission.