What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on enterprise new employee onboarding training materials. The sources are three types of documents: onboarding training plans, course sign-in sheets, and job descriptions. The update cadence is synchronized by batch and version. The onboarding training plan includes training batch, course name, start and end dates, and the person in charge's signature field; the course sign-in sheet includes trainee name, department, sign-in date, personal signature, and receipt; the job description includes job title, responsibility items, version number, effective date, and approval signature. When these three types of materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt feature, each plays a different role: the training plan is used to check whether courses and dates cover job requirements, the sign-in sheet is used to check whether personnel and receipts are complete, and the job description is used to check whether job titles and versions are consistent. Field characteristics are concentrated in five categories: name, quantity, date, version, and signature, making item-by-item comparison easy.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, and outputs the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The exception list and review conclusions are then completed by the model. External entry points and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions. The memory turns and prompt configuration itself does not generate access entry points, nor does it perform identity or file authentication.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Onboarding training plan | Course name, start and end dates, and person in charge's signature match the sign-in sheet item by item | Check the memory turns in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and compare the dates and signatures between the plan and the sign-in sheet |
| Course sign-in sheet | Trainee name, sign-in date, personal signature, and receipt match the plan roster item by item | Retrieve messages and chatId to locate the original records, and check the names, quantities, and dates between the sign-in sheet and the plan roster |
| Job description | Job title, version number, effective date, and approval signature match the training plan item by item | Check the job fields in variables and the description version, and mark an exception when the version is not synchronized |
| Exception list and review conclusions | Exceptions are supported by original records and signed by the reviewer | Create an exception record, see whether it can be traced back to the source material, and check the signature fields on the list and conclusions |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same trainee's name, quantity, and date do not match across two materials. Cause: Different entry batches, and item-by-item backfilling was not performed according to the original records.
- Symptom: The job description version is not synchronized, and the training plan still references the old version. Cause: The version number and effective date were not checked together when the file was updated.
- Symptom: The sign-in sheet lacks a signature or receipt, but the review conclusion is still submitted. Cause: The review step did not list signatures and receipts as release conditions.
How to verify the setup
This feature acceptance: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question inherits the reference from the first question; if the answer does not address the question, check the memory turns value and the messages range.
Business test: Create an exception record, see whether it can be traced back to the source material, and confirm that the exception list and review conclusions are supported by original records and signed by the reviewer.
- Check the memory turns in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and confirm that the second question correctly inherits the reference from the first question.
- Compare the usage records of two runs, confirm the consumption change after adjusting the turns, and check whether
chatIdandvariablespoint to the correct materials.