What this category's data looks like
This category's data revolves around three types of materials: the college entrance examination registration form, household registration and student status certificates, and materials for children accompanying migrant workers. The registration form is filled in by the candidate and initially reviewed by the school, with fields including name, ID number, graduating school, examination category, and signature; the household registration and student status certificates are issued by the public security authorities and the school, with fields including household registration address, move-in date, student status number, and seal; the materials for children accompanying migrant workers are provided by parents and relevant departments, with fields including residence permit number, months of social insurance contributions, employment certificate, and receipt. The three types of materials enter in batches according to the registration batch, and the update rhythm is based on review milestones, with differences in field formats and date notation. When entering the exception tracing and manual review function, the registration form serves as the main record, the household registration and student status certificates are used to verify identity and continuity of student status, and the materials for children accompanying migrant workers are used to verify residence and social insurance conditions; the three are linked by the same candidate identifier for reviewers to compare fields, dates, and signatures.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the reference range of historical messages and answer constraints. The exception list and review conclusions are then completed by the model, and the external entry point and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions. The memory turns control how many previous turns of dialogue can be referenced at most when answering; if the value is too small, the preceding context cannot be used, and if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| College entrance examination registration form | Name, ID number, graduating school, examination category, and candidate signature are complete and consistent with the household registration and student status certificates | Read the registration form fields, check the signature and date, and record name differences with the other two materials |
| Household registration and student status certificates | Household registration address, move-in date, student status number, and seal can support registration qualification, and the date does not conflict with the registration form | Compare the move-in date with the start and end of student status, and check whether the seal and receipt are missing |
| Materials for children accompanying migrant workers | Residence permit number, months of social insurance contributions, employment certificate, and receipt are within the validity period and the months are continuous | Check the social insurance months and the validity period of the residence permit, and mark records missing signatures or receipts |
| Multi-turn dialogue record | The second-round follow-up can carry forward the reference from the first round, and the historical message range matches the answer constraints | Run a trial with two consecutive rounds of questions, check the association between messages and chatId, and adjust variables if necessary |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name or move-in date of the same candidate does not match between the registration form and the household registration and student status certificates. Cause: The two materials have different reporting standards, and field-level comparison was not performed by the same candidate identifier.
- Symptom: The social insurance months in the materials for children accompanying migrant workers and the validity period version of the residence permit are not synchronized. Cause: The materials were submitted in batches, the old version was not replaced, and the review still judged based on the old receipt.
- Symptom: The registration form lacks the candidate's signature or the materials for children accompanying migrant workers lack a receipt. Cause: The review stage did not list signatures and receipts as mandatory check items, and the exception list did not mark the source of the missing items.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question carries forward the reference from the first question, and check whether the messages range matches the answer constraints.
Business test: create an exception record, see whether the source material can be traced, and confirm that the exception is supported by the original record and that the reviewer's signature can be checked.
- In the application settings, check the current value of memory turns, match it with the preceding context range required by the question, and compare the usage records of two runs.
- Run a trial with two consecutive rounds of questions, check whether the second round carries forward the reference, and confirm the reference range of
chatIdandvariablesin the historical messages.