What this category's data looks like
This category's data covers three types of materials in university admissions medical examination organization: medical examination forms, re-examination applications, and restricted-major notifications. Medical examination forms are issued by the examination station and contain name, gender, past medical history, conclusions for each subject, chief examiner signature, and date; re-examination applications are submitted by the candidate or the middle school and contain the reason for application, original examination conclusion, items to be re-examined, submission date, and receipt; restricted-major notifications are issued by the admissions department and contain the name of the restricted major, the clause on which it is based, the candidate's confirmation signature, and the delivery date. Materials enter in batches, and the update rhythm is synchronized with admissions and enrollment milestones; the core fields are name, ID number, item name, quantity, date, and signature. When entering workflow orchestration, the medical examination form plays the role of the original record, the re-examination application plays the role of trigger and supplement, and the restricted-major notification plays the role of the basis for handling; together, the three support exception tracing and manual review.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch direction and interaction status records. The exception list and review conclusions are completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution along the branches. When a node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow status; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Medical examination form | Whether the name, ID number, conclusions for each subject, chief examiner signature, and date are consistent with the original record | Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, trigger once to view the node status in the run record, and reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node and do a trial run |
| Re-examination application | Whether the reason for application, original examination conclusion, items to be re-examined, submission date, and receipt correspond to the medical examination form | Check the field correspondence between the reason for application and the original examination conclusion, check whether the submission date and receipt signature are complete, and confirm whether the version is synchronized |
| Restricted-major notification | Whether the name of the restricted major, the clause on which it is based, the candidate's confirmation signature, and the delivery date are consistent with the re-examination conclusion | Check the field correspondence between the name of the restricted major and the clause on which it is based, check whether the confirmation signature and delivery date are complete, and confirm whether the version is synchronized |
| Exception list and review conclusions | Whether the exception items are supported by original records and whether the reviewer's signature is complete | Trace each exception item one by one to the corresponding medical examination form, re-examination application, and restricted-major notification, check the signature and date, and then hand it to the person in charge for handling |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same candidate's name is written differently in the medical examination form and the re-examination application, and the quantity and date do not match. Cause: The two materials are entered in different steps, and there is no unified verification rule.
- Phenomenon: The restricted-major notification has been updated, but the medical examination form is still the old version, and the basis clause and conclusion are inconsistent. Cause: The version is not synchronized, and material updates do not trigger re-verification.
- Phenomenon: The re-examination application lacks a receipt or the restricted-major notification lacks the candidate's confirmation signature, so the exception cannot be closed. Cause: Signatures and receipts are not included in field verification and are missed during material circulation.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: run a trial for each option, check the branch direction and interaction status in the run record, confirm that each option corresponds to one branch, that the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes, and record how variables and nodeId are referenced in the run record.
Business test: create an exception record, see whether it can be traced back to the source materials, and check whether the fields, dates, and signatures of the medical examination form, re-examination application, and restricted-major notification are consistent.
- Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, trigger once to view the node status in the run record, and confirm that the process continues downward after the interaction is completed.
- Reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node and do a trial run to check whether the exception list and review conclusions are completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution along the branches.