What this category's data looks like
In the teacher qualification exam and certification scenario, materials mainly consist of written and interview registration forms, Mandarin proficiency certificates, and medical examination forms. Registration forms come from the exam registration system and offline confirmation points, with fields including name, ID number, exam subjects, exam district, date, and signature; Mandarin proficiency certificates are issued by testing institutions, with fields including grade, certificate number, and test date; medical examination forms are issued by designated hospitals, with fields including medical examination conclusion, date, and physician signature. The three types of materials update at different rhythms: registration forms are generated centrally by batch, Mandarin proficiency certificates are issued on a rolling basis by test batch, and medical examination forms are produced individually by examination date. When entering the exception tracing and manual review function, the registration form assumes the role of the primary record, while the Mandarin proficiency certificate and medical examination form assume the role of comparison and supporting evidence, used to check whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record are consistent across the two materials, and to check whether signatures or receipts are complete.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The exception list and review conclusions are then completed by the model, while the external entry point and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Written and interview registration form | Name, ID number, exam subjects, exam district, date, and signature must be aligned item by item with the Mandarin proficiency certificate and medical examination form | Retrieve the original registration form record, verify the fields and signature, and use chatId to associate multiple rounds of follow-up questions for the same record |
| Mandarin proficiency certificate | Certificate number, grade, and test date must be consistent with the information filled in the registration form; a missing receipt is regarded as pending supplementation | Compare the certificate number with the registration form fields, check whether the receipt is complete, and use messages to trace the previous comparison conclusions |
| Medical examination form | Medical examination conclusion, date, and physician signature must match the registration form batch date; unsynchronized versions must be flagged | Verify the medical examination date and signature, flag version differences, and use variables to record the comparison fields and conclusions |
| Exception list and review conclusions | Exceptions are supported by original records, signed by the reviewer, and handed over to the person in charge for disposition | Summarize the exception entries and attach source material references, confirm the reviewer's signature, and hand them over to the person in charge |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the name and date of the same record do not match between the registration form and the Mandarin proficiency certificate. Cause: the two materials are entered at different stages, and field-level comparison and version synchronization were not performed.
- Symptom: the medical examination form lacks a physician signature or receipt, yet the exception list is still submitted. Cause: the review stage did not check signatures and receipts item by item, and missing items were not intercepted.
- Symptom: during consecutive follow-up questions, the second question uses a reference but the answer is off-topic, responses become slower, and consumption increases. Cause: the memory turns value does not match the preceding context range, bringing in irrelevant content.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question picks up the reference from the first; combine chatId, messages, and variables to verify the referenced historical message range and answer constraints.
Business test: create an exception record, see whether the source material can be traced, and confirm that the exception is supported by original records and handed over to the person in charge for disposition after the reviewer signs.
- In the application settings, check the current value of memory turns, match it with the preceding context range required by the question, and compare the usage records of two runs.
- Run a trial with two consecutive question sentences, check whether the second round correctly picks up the reference from the first round, and confirm that the opening message is not treated as preceding context.