What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on the preliminary screening of academic journal submissions. The materials include three types: submitted manuscripts, author information forms, and plagiarism check reports. Manuscripts come from the author submission system, author information forms come from the metadata filled in at submission, and plagiarism check reports are generated by the plagiarism check tool and returned. In terms of update cadence, manuscripts are updated with version iterations, author information forms are synchronized with author revisions, and plagiarism check reports are generated once before preliminary screening. Field characteristics: manuscripts contain title, author byline, affiliation, funding, and date; author information forms contain name, affiliation, order, contact information, and signature field; plagiarism check reports contain title, author, plagiarism check date, duplication rate, and detection number. When the materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt feature, the manuscript serves as the subject being questioned, the author information form serves as the basis for verifying the byline and affiliation, and the plagiarism check report serves as the basis for verifying the date and number. Together, the three support exception tracing and manual review.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The exception list and review conclusions are then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous turns of dialogue can be referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, prior context cannot be used; if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Submitted manuscript | Title, author byline, affiliation, and date are consistent with the author information form; missing signature or receipt must be flagged | Check item by item against the author information form, check whether versions are synchronized, and record inconsistent fields |
| Author information form | Name, affiliation, order, and contact information are consistent with the manuscript byline; signature field is complete | Cross-compare with the manuscript and plagiarism check report, confirm date and signature, and list missing items in the exception list |
| Plagiarism check report | Title, author, plagiarism check date, and detection number are consistent with the manuscript; unsynchronized versions must be flagged | Check the report date against the manuscript version, check the receipt, and record number discrepancies |
| Multi-turn dialogue and prompts | Memory turns match the prior context range required by the question, and continuous follow-up questions can carry forward references | Check the current value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive question turns, and inspect messages and chatId |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the manuscript and the author information form. Cause: The two materials were entered separately without cross-checking.
- Phenomenon: The plagiarism check report version is not synchronized, and the report date is inconsistent with the manuscript version. Cause: The report was not regenerated after the manuscript was updated.
- Phenomenon: The author information form lacks a signature or receipt, and the review conclusion cannot be confirmed. Cause: The signature field was not filled in, and the receipt was not returned.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question carries forward the reference from the first question; check the memory turns in the application settings, inspect messages and chatId, and confirm the referenced historical message range and answer constraints.
Business test: Create an exception record, see whether the source material can be traced, and check the fields, dates, and signatures of the submitted manuscript, author information form, and plagiarism check report.
- Check the memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive question turns, inspect
messagesandchatId, and confirm that the second question carries forward the reference from the first question. - Compare the fields, dates, and signatures of the submitted manuscript, author information form, and plagiarism check report, record inconsistencies item by item, and form an exception list and review conclusion.