What this category's data looks like
This category's data involves three types of materials: business cooperation agreements, advertising review forms, and distribution cooperation materials. Business cooperation agreements come from partner signing and internal approval, and contain the partner name, cooperation term, revenue-sharing terms, and signatures of both parties; advertising review forms come from the advertising department, and contain the advertiser, issue date, placement, review opinion, and signature; distribution cooperation materials come from distribution channels, and contain the channel name, distribution quantity, settlement cycle, and receipt. The three types of materials are updated monthly and quarterly, and the fields are mainly names, quantities, dates, and signatures. When entering this function, the business cooperation agreement serves as the main record anchor, and the advertising review form and distribution cooperation materials serve as comparison sources, used to trace field differences of the same record across the materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction state records. The "exception list and review conclusions" are continued and completed by subsequent nodes according to the branches.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Business cooperation agreement | Check whether the partner name, cooperation term, revenue-sharing quantity, and signature dates of both parties are consistent | Retrieve the original agreement, check the name, quantity, date, and signature fields, and record the differing fields |
| Advertising review form | Check whether the advertiser, issue date, placement, and review opinion signature correspond to the agreement | Compare the advertising terms in the agreement, verify the date and signature on the review form, and mark missing signatures or receipts |
| Distribution cooperation materials | Check whether the channel name, distribution quantity, settlement cycle, and receipt are synchronized | Compare against the agreement and review form, verify the distribution quantity and settlement date, and record items whose versions are not synchronized |
| User selection node | Check whether each option corresponds to one branch and whether the interaction state is recorded | Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, trigger a run record view, and reference variables and nodeId to confirm that the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name and quantity of the same record do not match between the agreement and the review form. Cause: The two materials are entered in different stages, and the fields are not cross-checked.
- Symptom: The version of the distribution cooperation materials is not synchronized, and the settlement cycle is inconsistent with the agreement. Cause: After the materials are updated, they are not returned to the main record, and the version number is not unified.
- Symptom: The advertising review form lacks a signature or receipt, and the review cannot be closed. Cause: The signing step is not completed before entering the next node, and the receipt is not archived.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: test each option one by one, check the branch direction and interaction state in the run record, and confirm that variables and nodeId references take effect in subsequent nodes.
Business test: create an exception record, see whether the source material can be traced, and check whether the name, quantity, date, and signature are traceable.
- Check the options and branch connections one by one in the user selection node, and trigger a view of the node status in the run record
- Reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node and run it once to confirm that the branch direction is consistent with the interaction state record