What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the kindergarten play activity organization scenario. Materials include observation records, area activity plans, material placement checklists, activity objective comparison tables, reflection records, and next-week plan linkage tables. Observation records are written on site by teachers, area plans are formulated uniformly by the grade group, material placement checklists are verified jointly by caregivers and teachers, activity objective comparison tables come from the kindergarten-based curriculum plan, and reflection records and next-week plan linkage tables are updated weekly by class teachers. When these materials enter the knowledge base retrieval node, each plays a different role: observation records and area plans are used to determine whether the two correspond, material placement checklists are used to verify whether quantities are sufficient, activity objective comparison tables are used to check whether objectives and observations are consistent, and reflection and next-week plan linkage tables are used to confirm whether plans have been updated. The update cadence is once per week. Field characteristics include class, area name, week number, objective item, material name and quantity, observation subject and behavior description, reflection points, and next-week adjustments. For external services, parents or superiors access through restricted identities; the visible scope is set by class and role, and unauthorized content is not visible.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs an array of citation content, each containing the original text snippet and source identifier, and the length can be 0. The externally available entry points and authorization scope are subsequently completed by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Citation content is output as an array, and the length can be 0; even if no content is retrieved, the output chain will still run through.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Correspondence between observation records and area plans | Determine whether the behavior descriptions in the observation records can correspond to the objective items in the area plans; do not write that configuration is complete | Open the conversation citation badge, compare against the source document, and verify whether the observation snippet and the plan item point to the same area and the same week number |
| Material placement quantity | Determine whether the quantities in the material placement checklist meet the activity headcount and play needs in the area plans; do not write that settings are correct | Check the checklist quantities against the planned headcount item by item, record discrepancy items, and check whether the citation snippet points back to the original paragraph |
| Activity objective achievement | Determine whether the objectives in the activity objective comparison table match the behavioral evidence in the observation records; do not write that it has been linked | Open the citation badge in the conversation, compare the objective items with the observation snippets, and confirm whether the objectives and observations are consistent |
| Reflection to next-week plan | Determine whether the adjustment points in the reflection records appear in the next-week plan linkage table; do not write that configuration is complete | Check the reflection points against the next-week plan items, confirm whether the plan has been updated, and record items that have not been updated |
Three common errors
- Symptom: there is no citation badge in the answer. Cause: no material was hit in this round or the citation output was not adopted by subsequent nodes. First check whether there was a hit and which material was hit, then check
quoteMaxTokenand thequoteListfield inresponseData(non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled). - Symptom: insufficient materials cause the activity to be unable to proceed as planned. Cause: the quantities in the material placement checklist do not match the planned headcount in the area plans, the checklist was not updated with the plan, and the material gap was not recorded in the observation records.
- Symptom: objectives and observations do not match, and the plan was not updated. Cause: the activity objective comparison table was not adjusted with the week number, the behavioral evidence in the observation records points to old objectives, and the reflection points were not written into the next-week plan linkage table.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: ask a question with source-text support, and check whether the citation array and badges can point back to the original text; then ask a question with no matching materials, and confirm that the array is empty while the chain still runs through. The number of citations is the array length, and quoteMaxToken is the citation content budget; the two are not compared for equality. When the citation upper limit is involved, check the tokens of the citation text, and record the array count separately.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity, and see whether the visible scope matches the settings, with unauthorized content not visible.
- In the node, check whether the selected knowledge base collections and their vector models are consistent, and open the search parameter panel to check the values item by item.
- Run a trial with a question that has no matching materials, see that the output is empty while the chain continues, then open the citation badges and compare against the source documents to confirm that each citation can point back to the original paragraph.