What this category's data looks like
For primary and secondary school admissions organizations, external service materials usually include three types: admissions plans, application material checklists, and admission lists. Admissions plans are published by academic year or batch and include application conditions, time nodes, and admission rules; application material checklists are updated in sync with the plans and list fields such as household registration, property, and student status, along with submission dates; admission lists are generated after review is completed and include student names, admission categories, and publicity dates, and require handler signatures and receipts. When these three types of materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt feature, the admissions plans and material checklists serve as the basis for answers, while the admission lists are constrained by the authorization scope and are open only to matching identities. In terms of field characteristics, the names, quantities, and dates of the same record in the plan and the checklist must be consistent, versions must be synchronized, and signatures and receipts are indispensable. The update rhythm follows the batch cycle: plans first, checklists follow, and lists come later. If the version of any step is not synchronized, external messaging will be inconsistent.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, and outputs the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The externally available entry points and authorization scope are determined by the publishing service and file permissions, and the model only processes filtered materials. The model answers accordingly, while the publishing service and file permissions handle entry points and authentication.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions plan | Names, dates, signatures, and the application material checklist correspond consistently | Check the plan version number and checklist dates, and confirm that handler signatures and receipts are complete |
| Application material checklist | Fields and quantities match the records in the admission list item by item | Access once with a restricted identity and check whether the checklist fields and list quantities match |
| Admission list | Publicity dates and admission categories are consistent with the plan rules, and signatures are not missing | Compare the list and plan dates, confirm signatures and receipts, and check whether unauthorized content is invisible |
| Memory turns | Match the preceding context range required by the question | Check the current value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and inspect messages and variables |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name or quantity of the same student does not match between the plan and the admission list. Cause: The versions of the two materials are not synchronized; after the checklist is updated, the list still uses the old fields.
- Phenomenon: The application material checklist dates conflict with the plan time nodes, and parents see two different versions. Cause: The plan was published first, and when the checklist followed, the dates were not written back, and signature confirmation was missing.
- Phenomenon: In a second consecutive follow-up question, when a reference is used, the answer does not address the question, and responses become slower and consumption increases. Cause: The memory turns value is too large and brings in irrelevant content, or the opening message is treated as preceding context.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question carries forward the reference from the first, and check whether the referenced historical message range in messages and variables matches the setting.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible range matches the setting, and confirm that unauthorized content is invisible.
- Check the current memory turns value in the application settings and compare it with the preceding context range required by the question
- Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that run consumption changes accordingly after adjusting the turns