Multi-Turn Conversation and Prompts for School Moral Education and Class Teacher Work: Manage Authorized Access and External Services

Pastoral Education: review conversation for authorized access. Check source versions, input mappings and the values received by downstream nodes.

What this category's data looks like

In the context of school moral education and homeroom teacher work, external materials are concentrated in three categories: themed class meeting plans, student comprehensive quality records, and home visit records. Themed class meeting plans include activity objectives, procedures, dates, and homeroom teacher signatures, and are usually updated weekly; student comprehensive quality records include moral conduct performance, activity participation, and evaluation grades, and are summarized by semester or month; home visit records include visit time, subject, key communication points, parent signatures, and receipts, and are added entry by entry as home visits progress. When these three types of materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt feature, their roles differ: themed class meeting plans are used as reusable templates and are asked for details; student comprehensive quality records are used as controlled data and are cited within a limited scope; home visit records are used as evidence with signatures and receipts and are checked for consistency. External entry points and authorization scope are handled by the publishing service and file permissions, while the materials themselves only provide the basis for answers. The update rhythm follows homeroom teacher submission, grade-level aggregation, and moral education office archiving, with fields and signatures synchronized with versions.

Configuration and implementation checks

This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, which output the historical message range referenced and the answer constraints. "External entry points and authorization scope" are determined by the publishing service and file permissions, and the model only processes filtered materials. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering; if the value is too small, prior context cannot be used, and if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.

ObjectCheckVerification action
Themed class meeting planFields, dates, and signatures are complete, and the name and quantity of the same plan are consistent in two materialsCheck the memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, check whether the second round inherits the reference from the first round, and record chatId and messages
Student comprehensive quality recordThe record name, quantity, date, and signature match each other in the external materialsAccess once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the setting, and check the field scope passed in variables
Home visit recordVisit time, subject, key communication points, parent signature, and receipt are not missingCompare the usage records of two runs, confirm that usage changes accordingly after adjusting the turns, and check whether the receipt is synchronized with the version

Three common errors

  • Phenomenon: The name and quantity of the same themed class meeting plan do not match between the moral education office summary table and the class archive. Cause: The two materials were edited separately, versions were not synchronized, and signatures and receipts were not updated with the latest draft.
  • Phenomenon: The date and evaluation grade of student comprehensive quality records are inconsistent in external materials. Cause: Records were added in multiple batches, fields were not checked uniformly, and parent signatures and receipts are missing.
  • Phenomenon: During continuous follow-up questions, the second question uses a reference but the answer does not address it, responses become slower, and consumption rises. Cause: The memory turns value does not match the prior context range, and the opening message is brought in as prior context.

How to verify the setup

Acceptance of this feature: run a trial with two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question inherits the reference from the first question, and check the historical message range and answer constraints corresponding to the three identifiers chatId, messages, and variables.

Business test: access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the setting, and unauthorized content is not visible.

  • Check the current memory turns value in the application settings, and publish only after it matches the prior context range required by the question.
  • Compare the usage records of two runs, confirm that usage changes accordingly after adjusting the turns, and check whether signatures and receipts are complete.