What this category's data looks like
This category's data looks like this. Undergraduate program setup and dynamic adjustment involves three types of materials: program setup application forms, talent cultivation plans, and expert demonstration opinions. The application form contains fields such as program name, code, length of schooling, degree-granting category, enrollment scale, faculty and conditions, and the date and signature fields must be complete; the talent cultivation plan contains training objectives, curriculum system, credits and class hours, and practical components, and the names and quantities must be consistent with the application form; the expert demonstration opinions contain demonstration conclusions, expert lists, signatures, and receipts. Materials are updated according to the academic-year application cycle, and different versions are formed by internal review and higher-level filing. When entering workflow orchestration, the application form serves as the main record entry point, the cultivation plan is referenced as an attachment, and the demonstration opinions are attached as the basis for approval. The fields, dates, and signatures of the three must be aligned item by item, and only after version synchronization can external services be provided.
Configuration and implementation checks
Configuration and implementation checks. This link is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction state records. "Externally available entry points and authorization scope" are completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branch. When a node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow state. After the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Program setup application form | Category verification dimensions: program name, code, length of schooling, degree-granting category, enrollment scale, faculty conditions, date and signature must be consistent with the talent cultivation plan and expert demonstration opinions | Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, trigger once to view the node status in the run record, and reference the selection result variables and nodeId in subsequent nodes for a trial run |
| Talent cultivation plan | Category verification dimensions: the names and quantities of training objectives, curriculum system, credits and class hours, and practical components must be consistent with the application form, and the versions must be synchronized | Compare the names and quantities field by field against the application form, check whether the date and signature receipt are complete, and run a trial once to confirm the branch direction |
| Expert demonstration opinions | Category verification dimensions: demonstration conclusions, expert lists, signatures, and receipts must be complete, and the dates must correspond to the application form and talent cultivation plan | Check whether signatures and receipts are missing, compare date consistency, and trigger once to view the interaction state record |
| External service entry point | Check: visitor identity matches the visible scope, and unauthorized access is not visible | Access once with a restricted identity, check whether the visible scope matches the setting, and verify the branch direction and interaction state record |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: the same program name is written differently or the quantity does not match between the application form and the cultivation plan. Cause: the two materials are maintained separately, without field-level comparison and version synchronization.
- Phenomenon: expert demonstration opinions lack signatures or receipts, and the dates are inconsistent with the application form. Cause: the signature and date fields were not validated during material collection, and receipts were not archived.
- Phenomenon: after selecting an option, the default branch is still followed, and the process stops after the interaction is completed. Cause: the options and branch connections were not checked one by one, and the selection result variable was not passed to subsequent nodes.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: run trials for each option one by one, check the branch direction and interaction state in the run record, confirm that the selection result variables has been passed to subsequent nodes, and rerun once by referencing nodeId in subsequent nodes.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity and see whether the visible scope matches the setting.
- Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, and trigger once to view the node status in the run record.
- Reference the selection result variable in subsequent nodes and run a trial once to confirm that the branch direction is consistent with the interaction state record.