What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the student disciplinary action and appeal handling category; the source materials are archives from the school's student affairs department, departmental academic affairs, and disciplinary inspection, and the update cadence is synchronized with disciplinary process milestones and appeal acceptance cycles. The core materials entering this function include: disciplinary fact materials, which record the course of conduct, evidence list, and investigation date, and serve as the basis for the disciplinary decision; the disciplinary decision document, which states the disciplinary level, effective date, delivery signature, and appeal deadline; and the appeal statement, submitted by the student or parent, containing the appeal request, factual grounds, signature, and receipt. The three types of materials play different roles in authorized access and external services: disciplinary fact materials and the disciplinary decision document are used for internal review and are open to higher authorities, while the appeal statement is used for openness to parents or higher authorities. Field characteristics center on names, quantities, dates, and signatures; the same record often shows mismatched names, quantities, and dates across the two materials, versions are not synchronized, and signatures or receipts are missing.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turn count and prompt configuration in the app settings, and outputs the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The externally available entry points and authorization scope are determined by the publishing service and file permissions; the model only processes filtered materials, while the publishing service and file permissions handle identity and file authentication.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Disciplinary fact materials | Consistent with the conduct name, quantity, and date in the disciplinary decision document, with complete signature and receipt | Check the memory turn count value in the app settings, use two consecutive follow-up questions to confirm that the second question carries forward the reference of the first, and check the historical range in messages |
| Disciplinary decision document | Consistent with the disciplinary level, effective date, and appeal deadline in the appeal statement, with synchronized versions | Check the conversation record corresponding to chatId, compare the names, quantities, and dates in the two materials, and confirm there are no missing signatures or receipts |
| Appeal statement | Consistent with the student name, disciplinary document number, and delivery date in the disciplinary decision document | Check the memory turn count in the app settings, check whether the fields brought in via variables are consistent with the materials, and confirm that items with unsynchronized versions are marked |
| External entry points and authorization scope | Visitor identity matches the visible scope, and unauthorized content is not visible | Access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the settings, and confirm that entry points open to parents or higher authorities display only authorized materials |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the same record's name, quantity, and date do not match between the disciplinary fact materials and the disciplinary decision document. Cause: the two materials were entered separately, without cross-checking and version synchronization.
- Symptom: the disciplinary level or effective date is inconsistent between the disciplinary decision document and the appeal statement. Cause: versions are not synchronized, and the old version of the materials is still visible within the authorization scope.
- Symptom: materials missing signatures or receipts still enter the external entry point. Cause: the authorization scope is not filtered by signature and receipt status, and restricted identities can see unauthorized content.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question carries forward the reference of the first, and check the historical range and fields in messages, chatId, and variables.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the settings, and unauthorized content is not visible.
- Check the memory turn count value in the app settings, confirm it matches the preceding context range required by the question, and compare the usage records of two runs.
- Access the external entry point with a restricted identity, and check whether the names, quantities, dates, and signatures/receipts of the disciplinary fact materials, disciplinary decision document, and appeal statement are consistent.