What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the graduate admissions re-examination and admission scenario; materials include the re-examination plan, candidate score sheets, and adjustment lists. The re-examination plan states the process, time nodes, and signature fields; candidate score sheets record each candidate's preliminary examination, re-examination, and total scores, and must be consistent with the dates and names in the plan; the adjustment list sets out adjustment candidates and quota numbers, and the quantities must match the corresponding records in the score sheets. The materials come from the admissions unit's internal review and finalization, and the update cadence advances with re-examination batches; common version iterations center on plan revisions and list additions. When entering the sharing and embedding feature, the re-examination plan serves as the external explanation entry point, while the score sheets and adjustment list serve as restricted data objects, each carrying explanation and evidentiary roles; fields, dates, and signatures must be checked item by item, and materials lacking signatures or receipts must not be released externally.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the sharing link in the publishing channel (the publishing service performs authentication), outputting the sharing link, display parameters, and authentication results. The externally available entry point and authorization scope are then completed by external visitors seeing the corresponding content according to their identity. The sharing link can be configured with an expiration time, per-minute access limit, credit limit, identity verification, and display items for quoted snippets, quoted full text, and source original text.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Re-examination plan | The dates and signature fields in the plan must be consistent with the corresponding records in the score sheets and adjustment list, and it may be released externally only after versions are synchronized | Check the plan dates, signatures, and receipts, compare the names and quantities in the score sheets and adjustment list, and inspect the configuration corresponding to shareId |
| Candidate score sheets | The candidate names, quantities, and dates in the score sheets must be aligned item by item with the plan and adjustment list, and the same record must not be inconsistent in two places | Compare the two materials candidate by candidate, and check the toggle states of quoted display items and whether they match the access identity |
| Adjustment list | The number of adjustment candidates in the list must be consistent with the corresponding records in the score sheets, and it must not be published when versions are not synchronized | Check the list quantities and dates, access once with a restricted identity, and confirm that unauthorized content is not visible |
| Sharing link | The link's expiration time, per-minute access limit, credit limit, and identity verification must match the expected access scope | Check the link configuration values, try once each with an over-limit request and an unauthenticated session, and record shareId and the authentication result |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the same candidate's name or quantity does not match between the score sheets and the adjustment list. Cause: the two materials were revised separately, versions were not synchronized, and unified checking and signature receipts were lacking.
- Symptom: the re-examination plan date is inconsistent with the date recorded in the score sheets. Cause: after the plan was revised, it was not written back to the score sheets, no item-by-item comparison was made between materials, and signature confirmation was lacking.
- Symptom: the link cannot be opened after some time or access is rate-limited. Cause: the expiration time and per-minute access limit were set according to old access volume, were not updated with the batch, and were not verified with an over-limit request.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: access once each with an unauthenticated session and an over-limit request, check the allowance and quoted display, confirm that the toggle states for quoted snippets, quoted full text, and source original text match the settings, and record the authentication result corresponding to shareId.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the settings, and whether the material fields, dates, and signatures are consistent with the authorization scope.
- Check the sharing link's expiration time, per-minute access limit, credit limit, and identity verification callback address, and compare each value against the expected access volume.
- Check the display toggles for quoted snippets, quoted full text, and source original text item by item, and access once with a restricted identity to confirm that unauthorized content is not visible.