What this category's data looks like
This category's data covers three types of materials involved in the formulation of talent cultivation programs in vocational colleges: talent cultivation programs, course standards, and job competency analysis tables. The talent cultivation program is drafted by the academic affairs office and the specialty leader, and is updated by academic year or revision cycle; its fields include specialty name, program length, cultivation objectives, course modules, class hours and credits, graduation requirements, approval signatures, and dates. Course standards are compiled course by course; their fields include course name, corresponding job, teaching objectives, teaching content, class hour allocation, assessment method, and teaching and research office signature. The job competency analysis table is formed through specialty research; its fields include job name, competency items, supporting courses, research date, and enterprise receipt. When these three types of materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt features, the talent cultivation program serves as the master outline providing the specialty and course framework, the course standards provide per-course constraints, and the job competency analysis table provides the basis for the correspondence between jobs and competencies. The memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings only output the reference range of historical messages and answer constraints; the externally facing entry points and authorization scope must be handled next by the model, and parents or superiors only see content within the authorized scope.
Configuration and implementation checks
The memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings only output the reference range of historical messages and answer constraints; the externally facing entry points and authorization scope must be handled next by the model. The memory turns control how many previous turns of dialogue are referenced at most when answering; if the value is too small, prior context cannot be used, and if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Talent cultivation program | The specialty name, program length, course modules, class hours and credits, approval signatures, and dates must be aligned item by item with the course standards and the job competency analysis table | Check the current memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, check whether the second question carries forward the reference from the first question, and verify the messages range corresponding to chatId |
| Course standards | The course name, corresponding job, class hour allocation, assessment method, and teaching and research office signature must be consistent with the talent cultivation program and the job competency analysis table | Access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the setting, and verify whether the course identifier in variables corresponds to the material fields |
| Job competency analysis table | The job name, competency items, supporting courses, research date, and enterprise receipt must be mutually corroborated with the talent cultivation program and the course standards | Compare the usage records of two runs, confirm that usage changes accordingly after the turns are adjusted, and check whether the receipt and signature are complete |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: For the same record, the course name, class hour quantity, and approval date do not match between the talent cultivation program and the course standards. Cause: The two materials were revised separately, without cross-checking and synchronized updating.
- Phenomenon: The job competency analysis table has an updated version, but the dialogue still references the old version of jobs and competency items. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and the historical message range covered outdated content.
- Phenomenon: The course standards lack the teaching and research office signature, and the job competency analysis table lacks the enterprise receipt. Cause: The materials entered external services before signatures and receipts were fully collected during the material circulation process.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question carries forward the reference from the first question, and verify the historical range of messages under chatId and the variables values.
Business test: Access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the setting, and unauthorized content is not visible.
- Check the current memory turns value in the application settings and match it with the prior context range required by the question.
- Compare the usage records of two runs and confirm that usage changes accordingly after the turns are adjusted.