What this category's data looks like
The formulation of talent cultivation plans in vocational colleges involves three types of materials: talent cultivation plans, course standards, and job competency analysis tables. The talent cultivation plan provides the major name, program duration, training objectives, and curriculum system; the course standards detail course objectives, content, and credit hours; the job competency analysis table lists job tasks, competency requirements, and corresponding courses. All three types of materials carry dates and signatures, and when they enter the authorized access and external service function, each is retrieved and cited as an independent source. In terms of update cadence, plans are revised according to the major adjustment cycle, course standards are updated with curriculum reform, and job competency analysis tables are supplemented on a rolling basis with enterprise research. Field characteristics are manifested as four types of verifiable items: names, quantities, dates, and signatures. The same record must be consistent across different materials, versions must be synchronized, and signatures and receipts must be complete.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs an array of cited content, each item containing the original text fragment and source identifier, and the length may be 0. The externally available entry points and authorization scope are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Associated knowledge base | The selected knowledge bases use the same vector model | In the node, check the selected collections and their vector models |
| Talent cultivation plan | Name, program duration, date, and signature are complete, and the course names and quantities are consistent with those in the course standards | Compare the plan and course standards item by item against the fields and dates |
| Course standards | Course names, credit hours, date, and signature are complete, and they correspond to the competency items in the job competency analysis table | Compare the course standards and job competency analysis table to verify competency items and credit hours |
| Cited content output | The number of returned items matches the materials hit; being empty is also normal | Run a test with a question that has no matching materials, and see whether the output is empty while the chain continues |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the talent cultivation plan and the course standards. Cause: The two materials were revised separately, without field-level comparison and receipt confirmation.
- Symptom: The course standards have been updated, but the job competency analysis table is still the old version. Cause: Versions were not synchronized, and there is a lack of a unified version identifier and update record.
- Symptom: Materials lack signatures or receipts, making the source impossible to confirm during external services. Cause: The issuance step was not closed-loop, and the signature page was not stored in the knowledge base together with the materials.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: ask a question with source-text support, and check whether the citation array and footnote markers can point back to the original text; then ask a question with no matching materials, and confirm that the array is empty while the chain runs through. The number of citations is the array length, and quoteMaxToken is the citation content budget; the two are not compared for equality. When citation limits are involved, check the tokens of the cited text, and record the array item count separately.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity, and see whether the visible scope matches the settings; unauthorized content is not visible, and the visitor identity matches the visible scope.
- Open the search parameter panel and check each item, confirming that the values are consistent with those set in the knowledge base retrieval section, and check the citation information in
responseData(non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) andquoteList. - Open the citation footnote markers in the conversation, compare them against the source documents, and verify that each citation can point back to the original text paragraph.