What this category's data looks like
Modern apprenticeship and order class management involves three types of materials: school-enterprise cooperation agreements, order class training plans, and master-apprentice records. The sources are academic affairs, partner enterprises, and mentoring masters, and the update cadence rolls with semesters, batches, and signature nodes. School-enterprise cooperation agreements contain the cooperation period, number of positions, and signatures and seals; order class training plans contain course modules, rotation arrangements, and assessment dates; master-apprentice records contain mentoring masters, apprentice lists, attendance, and signed receipts. When these three types of materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt feature, each plays a different role: school-enterprise cooperation agreements provide the scope of external services and authorization boundaries, order class training plans provide the training cycle and batch information, and master-apprentice records provide process-level details. The names, quantities, dates, and signatures of material fields must remain consistent across versions, and records missing signatures or receipts should not be used as an external basis.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turn count and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The externally available entry points and authorization scope are determined by the published service and file permissions, and the model only processes filtered materials. The memory turn count controls how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, prior context cannot be used; if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| School-enterprise cooperation agreement | Whether the cooperation period, number of positions, signatures and seals are consistent with the batch dates and headcount in the order class training plan | Check the current values in the application settings, use two consecutive follow-up questions to confirm that the agreement terms are correctly carried forward, and check the session scope corresponding to chatId |
| Order class training plan | Whether the course modules, rotation arrangements, and assessment dates match the batch, headcount, and dates in the master-apprentice records | Initiate two consecutive questions with a restricted identity, check whether the prior references in messages are correctly cited, and record the values of variables |
| Master-apprentice records | Whether the mentoring masters, apprentice lists, attendance, and signed receipts are complete, and whether the version is synchronized with the training plan | Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that after adjusting the turn count, the messages reference range matches the consumption changes |
| Multi-turn dialogue and prompts | Whether the second turn carries forward the first turn's reference during consecutive follow-up questions, and whether the opening message is mistakenly treated as prior context | Run a trial with two consecutive questions, and check the actual values of the three identifiers chatId, messages, and variables in the session |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the agreement and the training plan. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, without field-level comparison and version synchronization.
- Symptom: Master-apprentice records are missing signatures or receipts but are still used as an external basis. Cause: Signature fields are not validated when materials are ingested, and versions are not synchronized.
- Symptom: When the second question uses a reference, the answer does not address the question, responses become slower, and consumption rises. Cause: The memory turn count value does not match the prior context range, and the opening message is treated as prior context.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question carries forward the first question's reference, and check the values of chatId, messages, and variables in the session.
Business test: Access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the settings, and confirm that unauthorized content is not visible.
- Check the current memory turn count value in the application settings, and confirm it matches the prior context range required by the question.
- Compare the usage records of two runs, and confirm that after adjusting the turn count, consumption changes are recorded separately from the number of referenced items and the
quoteMaxTokenbudget.