What this category's data looks like
This category's data looks like Technical college school-enterprise education management involves three types of materials: student registration forms, teaching plans, and skills training records. Student registration forms come from the admissions and registration department and are updated according to semester registration milestones; fields include name, ID number, major, class, registration date, and signature. Teaching plans come from academic affairs and are revised by academic year or semester; fields include course name, class hours, week number, instructor, and approval signature. Skills training records come from the training workshop and are recorded by training project or week number; fields include project name, workstation, consumable quantity, training date, and instructor signature. When these three types of materials enter the forms and interaction function, student registration forms handle the collection of identity and class affiliation, teaching plans handle the collection of course and progress information, and skills training records handle the collection of training process and results; each serves as a field source for an externally accessible entry point, to be filled in or checked by visitors according to their identity, and the authorization scope determines the set of visible fields.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the form input node (interaction node) in the workflow, which outputs the field values filled in by the user (passed to subsequent nodes after submission). The externally accessible entry point and authorization scope are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually. After the form input node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow state. After the user completes the required items and submits, the form information is passed to subsequent nodes for use.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Student registration form | Whether the field names, registration date, and signature are consistent with the class and major in the teaching plan | Check the field names one by one in the node configuration, and compare the name, major, class, registration date, and signature in the student registration form with those in the teaching plan |
| Teaching plan | Whether the course name, class hours, and week number match the project and date in the skills training records | Check the field names one by one in the node configuration, and compare the course name, class hours, week number, and training date in the teaching plan with those in the skills training records |
| Skills training record | Whether the project name, consumable quantity, training date, and signature receipt are complete and version-synchronized | Check the field names one by one in the node configuration, and inspect the consumable quantity, training date, instructor signature, and receipt in the skills training record |
| Form input node | Whether the required markers cover key material fields, and whether subsequent nodes can obtain the field values after submission | Check the required settings one by one, reference the field in subsequent nodes and run a trial, and confirm that the field values are passed normally |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The major name for the same student is inconsistent between the student registration form and the teaching plan. Cause: The two materials are maintained by different departments, the naming conventions are not unified, and the update rhythms are not synchronized.
- Symptom: The consumable quantity in the skills training record does not match the week arrangement in the teaching plan. Cause: Training records are updated by project, while teaching plans are revised by semester, and the versions are not synchronized.
- Symptom: The student registration form lacks a signature or the skills training record lacks a receipt, yet it is still treated as externally accessible material. Cause: The required markers do not cover the signature and receipt fields, and submission is not blocked.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this function: fill it out once and submit, check the field values obtained by subsequent nodes, confirm that field passing works normally after formInput submission, that userSelect options correspond to field names, and that submission is not possible when required fields are empty.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the settings, that unauthorized fields are not visible, and that the authorization scope matches the visitor's identity.
- Check the field names and required markers one by one in the node configuration to ensure that the fields of the student registration form, teaching plan, and skills training records correspond one to one.
- Reference the
formInputResultandselectResultfields in subsequent nodes and run a trial to confirm that field values are passed normally after submission and that the conversation does not get stuck in the interactive state.