Multi-Turn Conversation and Prompts for Vocational College Skills Competition Organization: Manage Authorized Access and External Services

Skills Competitions: review conversation for authorized access. Check source versions, input mappings and the values received by downstream nodes.

What this category's data looks like

This category's data covers three types of materials: competition regulations, registration forms, and training plans. The sources are academic affairs and competition management departments, and the update cadence rolls with competition event notices, registration deadlines, and training camp phases. Regulations contain the event name, group, date, and signature fields; registration forms contain the contestant's name, the last four digits of the ID number, the instructor, contact information, and the receipt; training plans contain the week number, module, venue, and the training teacher's signature. When the materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt feature, the regulations take on the role of rule constraints, the registration forms take on the role of identity and visibility scope basis, and the training plans take on the role of process records. The external entry point and authorization scope are handled by the publishing service and file permissions, and the model answers only based on the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings.

Configuration and implementation checks

This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, and outputs the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The external entry point and authorization scope are determined by the publishing service and file permissions, and the model only processes the filtered materials. The model answers accordingly, while the external entry point and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions.

ObjectCheckVerification action
Memory turnsMatches the prior context range required by the questionCheck the current value in the application settings, and run a trial with two consecutive follow-up questions
Competition regulationsThe event name, group, date, and signature fields are consistent across the three materialsCompare the names, quantities, and dates in the regulations, registration forms, and training plans item by item
Registration formsThe contestant's name, instructor, and receipt signature are complete and the versions are in syncCheck whether the contestant counts, dates, and signatures in the registration forms and training plans match
Training plansThe week number, module, venue, and training teacher's signature are traceableAccess once with a restricted identity and see whether the visibility scope matches the identity in the registration forms

Three common errors

  • Symptom: the same contestant's name or instructor does not match across two materials. Cause: the registration forms and training plans are entered separately, without cross-checking.
  • Symptom: the regulation date has been updated, but the registration form still uses the old version. Cause: the versions are not in sync, and there is no receipt confirmation step.
  • Symptom: the second question uses a reference and the answer misses the point. Cause: the memory turns value does not match the prior context range required by the question.

How to verify the setup

Feature acceptance: ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question carries forward the reference from the first; check whether messages and chatId are associated as expected, and whether variables bring in the correct context.

Business test: access once with a restricted identity and see whether the visibility scope matches the settings.

  • Check the current memory turns value in the application settings, and run a trial with two consecutive questions.
  • Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that consumption changes accordingly after adjusting the turns.