What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on vocational college skills competition organization. The source materials are three documents: competition regulations, registration form, and training plan. The update cadence advances through three milestones: pre-competition preparation, registration deadline, and pre-competition training. The competition regulations carry the event name, group, date, and seal; the registration form carries the contestant name, ID number, supervising instructor, and signed receipt; the training plan carries training subjects, cycle, venue, and coach confirmation. When the three materials enter workflow orchestration, their roles differ: the competition regulations are the basis for the authorization scope, the registration form is the source of visitor identity, and the training plan is the trigger condition for branch direction. In terms of field characteristics, the three field types of name, quantity, and date appear repeatedly across materials; signature and receipt fields appear only in the registration form and training plan; the version number field is carried only by the competition regulations.
Configuration and implementation checks
This link is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch direction and interaction status records. "Externally available entry points and authorization scope" is then completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branch. When entering the node, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow status; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Competition regulations | Whether the event name, group, date, and seal are consistent with the registration form and training plan | Compare the name, quantity, and date fields of the three materials item by item, check whether signatures and receipts are complete, and verify options and branch connections one by one in the node |
| Registration form | Whether the contestant name, ID number, supervising instructor, and signed receipt correspond to the training plan | Reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node and run a trial once, checking the variables values and nodeId ownership |
| Training plan | Whether the training subjects, cycle, venue, and coach confirmation are synchronized with the regulations date | Trigger a user selection node once and check the node status and branch direction in the run record |
| User selection node | Each option corresponds to one branch, and the interaction status is recorded | Verify options and branch connections one by one in the node, checking the transfer of nodeId and variables |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same contestant name is written differently in the registration form and training plan. Cause: The two materials were entered separately, without field alignment and version synchronization.
- Phenomenon: The competition regulations date has been updated, but the training plan still uses the old version. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and there is no receipt confirming that the update was delivered.
- Phenomenon: The registration form lacks the supervising instructor's signature or receipt. Cause: The signature step was not included in the branch direction, and the process skips it directly after the interaction is completed.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: run trials for each option one by one, check the branch direction and interaction status in the run record, and check whether variables and nodeId are passed along with the branch.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity and see whether the visible scope matches the setting
- Verify options and branch connections one by one in the node, confirming that each option corresponds to one branch
- Trigger a user selection node once and check the node status and selection result variable in the run record