What this category's data looks like
In the authorized access and external services stage of vocational college skills competition organization, common materials include three types: competition regulations, registration forms, and training plans. Competition regulations come from the version reviewed and approved by the event organizing committee, updated by competition period batches, with fields including event name, group, date, and signature column; registration forms are submitted by participating schools, collected on a rolling basis according to the registration window, with fields including contestant name, ID number, advisor, and unit seal; training plans are compiled by the coaching team, iterated by week, with fields including stage objectives, number of class hours, equipment list, and review signature. The three types of materials play different roles when entering the form input function: regulations serve as the basis for determining the externally visible scope, registration forms serve as the entry credential for identity and authorization scope, and training plans serve as the input for subsequent nodes to assign training tasks. Field characteristics are concentrated in four categories: name, quantity, date, and signature. When comparing across materials, situations such as inconsistent name spelling for the same record, mismatched headcount and dates, unsynchronized versions, and missing signatures or receipts are prone to occur, and must be checked item by item before submission.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the form input node (interaction node) in the workflow, outputting the field values filled in by the user (passed to subsequent nodes after submission). The externally available entry and authorization scope are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually. After the form input node is triggered, the conversation enters an interaction state and records the workflow state. After the user fills in the required items and submits, the form information is passed to subsequent nodes for use.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Competition regulations | The event name, group, date, and signature column must correspond item by item with the registration form and training plan, and the version must be the current batch | Check the field names one by one in the node configuration, confirm that the regulation fields correspond one-to-one with the registration form fields, and check the required settings |
| Registration form | The contestant name, ID number, advisor, and unit seal must be consistent with the regulation group and training plan roster, with no missing signature or receipt | Submit once with a restricted identity, check whether subsequent nodes can retrieve the corresponding field values, and check whether submission is possible when required items are empty |
| Training plan | The stage objectives, number of class hours, equipment list, and review signature must align with the regulation competition period and the registration form headcount; when the version is not synchronized, it must not be visible | Reference this field in a subsequent node and run a trial to confirm that the field value is passed normally and that unauthorized identities cannot see it |
| Form fields | Field names correspond one-to-one with the material fields to be collected, and key material fields are marked as required | Check the field names and required markers one by one, and confirm that the field values can be referenced by subsequent nodes after submission |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, headcount, and date of the same contestant do not match between the registration form and the training plan. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, without cross-material field comparison and receipt verification.
- Symptom: The regulations have been updated to a new batch, but the registration form is still filled in according to the old group and date. Cause: The version is not synchronized, and the form has not been re-checked against the latest regulation fields.
- Symptom: After submission, subsequent nodes cannot retrieve the values, or submission is possible even when required items are empty, and the conversation stays in the interaction state. Cause: Field names and required markers were not checked one by one, and the transmission link was not trial-run.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: Fill in once and submit, check the field values retrieved by subsequent nodes, confirm that the field values output by the form input node are consistent with the submitted content, and that submission is not possible when required items are empty; reference the formInputResult and selectResult fields in subsequent nodes and run a trial to confirm that the values are retrieved normally.
Business test: Access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the settings, and that unauthorized content is not visible.
- In the node configuration, check the form field names and required markers one by one, confirm that they correspond one-to-one with the fields of the competition regulations, registration form, and training plan, and check the field names of
formInputResultandselectResult. - Reference this field in a subsequent node and run a trial to confirm that the field values are passed normally after submission, and check whether the conversation normally leaves the interaction state.