What this category's data looks like
Continuing education credit hour recognition materials consist of course filing forms, study certificates, and credit hour recognition forms. They come from archived documents of training institutions, schools, and competent authorities, and are updated by training batch and academic year. The course filing form records the course name, class hours, start date, and institutional seal; the study certificate records the trainee, course name, completion date, and institutional receipt; the credit hour recognition form records the recognized credit hours, recognition date, and review signature. After the materials enter the knowledge base retrieval service, each participates in recall as an independent segment: the filing form is used to verify the course and class hour standards, the study certificate is used to verify the fact of participation and the completion date, and the recognition form is used to verify the recognition result and the signature chain. Field characteristics are concentrated in four places: name, quantity, date, and signature. During retrieval, questions are formed by combining batch, academic year, and material type, so that candidate segments can be sorted by similarity score and then enter the cited content.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate segments and similarity scores (after mode, merge, rerank, filter, and upper-limit trimming). The externally available entry point and authorization scope are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Course filing form | Check whether the course name, class hour quantity, start date, and institutional seal are consistent with the study certificate | In the search test, search by course name plus batch, record the number of candidates and similarity scores, and switch searchMode to compare the three candidate paths: semantic, full-text, and hybrid |
| Study certificate | Check whether the trainee, course name, completion date, and institutional receipt correspond to the filing form | Search by trainee plus course name, check whether the candidates include both semantic and full-text results, and compare the ranking of the top few before and after enabling usingReRank |
| Credit hour recognition form | Check whether the recognized credit hours, recognition date, and review signature connect with the study certificate | Search by recognition batch plus academic year, check the key original text segments retained after similarity filtering, and separately record the number of items in the citation array |
| External entry point and authorization scope | Visitor identity matches the visible scope; unauthorized content is not visible | Access once with a restricted identity, check whether the returned candidates fall within the authorized scope, and record the number of citations and scores after limit trimming |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name or class hour quantity of the same course does not match between the filing form and the study certificate. Cause: The two materials are filled in separately by different institutions, versions are not synchronized, and field-level comparison is not performed after retrieval hits.
- Phenomenon: The credit hour recognition form lacks a review signature or institutional receipt. Cause: When materials are archived, only electronic copies are collected; the signature page and receipt page are not stored together, so recalled segments lack key paragraphs.
- Phenomenon: The completion date or recognition date of the same record is inconsistent between the two materials. Cause: Training batches span academic years, material update rhythms differ, and candidate segments are not reranked by date field.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: test once each with synonymously rewritten questions, compare the number of candidates and similarity scores, then toggle rerank on and off to observe the ranking of the top few; switch searchMode to observe the differences among semantic, full-text, and hybrid candidate paths, and check the tokens of the cited text after similarity filtering, recording the array length separately.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the setting, and unauthorized content should not appear in candidates or cited content.
- In the knowledge base search test, fix the question and batch, record the number of candidates, similarity scores, and citation array length item by item, forming a reviewable retrieval record.
- Perform field-level comparison on the course filing form, study certificate, and credit hour recognition form, mark inconsistencies in name, quantity, date, and signature, and then decide whether to supplement documents or rerank.