What this category's data looks like
Materials in the exam organization and disciplinary violation handling category include exam administration manuals, examination room records, and disciplinary violation fact records. Exam administration manuals come from the exam administration authority and are updated by academic year or exam batch; their fields include exam name, time, examination room number, candidate number, disciplinary violation clauses, and handling authority. Examination room records are filled in on the spot by invigilators and are updated by session; their fields include examination room number, expected and actual number of attendees, absences and abnormal situations, and invigilator signature. Disciplinary violation fact records are filled in by invigilators or roving inspectors and are updated by incident; their fields include candidate number, description of the disciplinary violation behavior, evidence list, determination conclusion, candidate signature, and receipt. When these three types of materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt feature, the exam administration manual provides the rule basis and authorization scope, the examination room record provides session facts and attendee count verification, and the disciplinary violation fact record provides case facts and signature/receipt verification. External entry points and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions, and the model answers accordingly.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, and outputs the reference range of historical messages and answer constraints. The "external entry points and authorization scope" are determined by the publishing service and file permissions, and the model only processes filtered materials. Memory turns control how many previous turns of dialogue can be referenced at most when answering; if the value is too small, prior context cannot be used, and if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Exam administration manual | The exam name, date, examination room number, disciplinary violation clauses, and handling authority are consistent between the manual and the record sheet | In the application settings, check the current memory turns value, run a trial with two consecutive questions, check whether the second question picks up the reference from the first question, and verify the transmission of chatId, messages, and variables in the session |
| Examination room record | For the same session, the expected and actual number of attendees, absences, and abnormal situations match the manual in name, quantity, and date | Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that usage changes accordingly after adjusting the turns, and check whether the record sheet signatures are complete |
| Disciplinary violation fact record | The candidate number, description of the disciplinary violation behavior, evidence list, determination conclusion, and candidate signature receipt are consistent between the record and the manual clauses | Access once with a restricted identity to see whether the visible scope matches the setting, and verify whether the dates and names in the disciplinary violation fact record and the examination room record match |
| Exam administration manual and disciplinary violation fact record | When versions are not synchronized, differences appear between the manual clauses and the case determination conclusion | Check the version numbers and update dates of the two materials, and confirm whether missing signatures or receipts affect the visible scope |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same disciplinary violation record do not match between the examination room record and the disciplinary violation fact record. Cause: The two materials are filled in separately without cross-checking.
- Phenomenon: The exam administration manual version is not synchronized, and old clauses are still referenced. Cause: The update cadence is inconsistent, and the publishing service does not cover all entry points.
- Phenomenon: The disciplinary violation fact record lacks the candidate signature or receipt. Cause: The on-site process is not closed-loop, and completeness is not verified before the materials enter the dialogue.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question picks up the reference from the first question, and verify whether the transmission of chatId, messages, and variables matches the setting.
Business test: Access once with a restricted identity to see whether the visible scope matches the setting.
- In the application settings, check the current memory turns value, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and confirm that the second question correctly picks up the reference from the first question.
- Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that usage changes accordingly after adjusting the turns, and check whether the versions and signature receipts of the exam administration manual, examination room record, and disciplinary violation fact record are complete.