What this category's data looks like
This category's data typically involves three types of materials: study abroad service contracts, school application forms, and personal statements. The contract states the scope of services, fees, and signatures of both parties; the application form contains the school name, program, enrollment date, and applicant's signature; the personal statement is the document version, containing the submission date and receipt records. The sources of materials are consultant compilation, applicant completion, and institution receipts, and the update cadence changes as application rounds progress: the contract is re-signed when terms change, the application form is re-filled when school selection is adjusted, and the personal statement is iterated with revised drafts. When these three types of materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt feature, their roles differ: the contract and application form provide identity and authorization boundaries, while the personal statement provides document context. Names, quantities, dates, and signatures must remain consistent across materials; unsynchronized versions or missing receipts will directly affect the determination of the external service scope.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the app settings, and outputs the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The externally available entry points and authorization scope are determined by the publishing service and file permissions, and the model only processes filtered materials. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering; too small a value fails to use prior context, while too large a value brings in irrelevant content and increases consumption.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Study abroad service contract | The scope of services, fees, and signature date in the contract must be consistent with the records in the application form and personal statement | Check the memory turns value in the app settings, initiate one access with a restricted identity, and verify whether the contract fields match the visible scope |
| School application form | The school name, program, and enrollment date in the application form must be consistent with the corresponding records in the contract and personal statement | Run a trial with two consecutive questions, use a reference in the second turn to carry forward the first turn, and check whether the application form fields are correctly referenced |
| Personal statement | The submission date, version number, and receipt of the personal statement must be synchronized with the contract and application form | Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm changes in the reference scope of messages and variables after adjusting the turns |
| External entry points and authorization scope | The visitor's identity matches the visible scope, and unauthorized content is not visible | Access once with a restricted identity and check whether the visible scope of the session corresponding to chatId matches the settings |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same application record do not match between the contract and the application form. Cause: The two materials were entered separately without cross-checking, and the versions were not synchronized.
- Symptom: The revised personal statement has been updated, but the contract and application form still reference the old version. Cause: The versions were not synchronized, signature or receipt records are missing, and the determination of the external service scope is inaccurate.
- Symptom: In consecutive follow-up questions, the second question uses a reference but the answer is off-topic, and responses become slower with increased consumption. Cause: The memory turns value does not match the prior context range required by the question, and the opening message is treated as prior context.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question carries forward the reference from the first; check the reference scope of messages and variables, and record the array length and the referenced text tokens separately.
Business test: Access once with a restricted identity and see whether the visible scope matches the settings; confirm that unauthorized content is not visible, and that the session scope corresponding to chatId matches the identity.
- Check the current memory turns value in the app settings, compare it with the prior context range required by the question, and adjust it.
- Run a trial with two consecutive questions, check how the second turn carries forward the reference, and compare the usage records of the two runs.