Knowledge Base Retrieval for College Entrance Exam Application Eligibility: Manage Authorized Access and External Services

Entrance Exam Eligibility: review retrieval for authorized access. Check source versions, input mappings and the values received by downstream nodes.

What this category's data looks like

The materials for general college entrance examination registration qualification review include the college entrance examination registration form, household registration and student status certificates, and materials for children accompanying migrating parents. They come from candidate submissions, initial school review, and departmental re-review, and their update pace advances with review batches and correction receipts. The registration form carries identity and examination category fields, the household registration and student status certificates carry the household registration address, student status start and end dates, and school signature, and the materials for children accompanying migrating parents carry the residence permit, social insurance contributions, and guardian signature. When these three types of materials enter knowledge base retrieval and recall, each serves as a source of candidate chunks, and fields, dates, and signatures are split into chunks for subsequent nodes or manual comparison of whether names, quantities, and dates are consistent.

Configuration and implementation checks

This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate chunks and similarity scores (after mode, merge, re-rank, filter, and upper-limit truncation). The externally available entry point and authorization scope are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually.

ObjectCheckVerification action
College entrance examination registration formIdentity fields and examination category must be consistent with the household registration and student status certificates, and signatures and receipts must be completeIn the search test, switch searchMode, view the registration form candidate chunks and scores, and check the name, date, and signature
Household registration and student status certificatesThe household registration address, student status start and end dates, and school signature must match the registration formCompare the top few rankings before and after enabling usingReRank, and verify whether the date and signature chunks are retained
Materials for children accompanying migrating parentsThe residence permit, social insurance, and guardian signature must be consistent with the same record name, quantity, and date in the registration formAdjust similarity and limit, record the number of candidate entries and scores, and verify whether key chunks are truncated
External entry point and authorization scopeVisitor identity matches the visible scope, and unauthorized access is not visibleAccess once with a restricted identity, and verify whether the visible material scope is consistent with the authorization settings

Three common errors

  • Phenomenon: The same candidate's name is written differently in the registration form and the household registration and student status certificates, causing recalled chunks to fail to match. Cause: The two entries were not unified, and versions were not synchronized.
  • Phenomenon: The social insurance months in the materials for children accompanying migrating parents are inconsistent with the quantity filled in the registration form, and candidate chunks contradict each other. Cause: After correction, the data was not written back, and the date fields were not updated synchronously.
  • Phenomenon: The household registration and student status certificates lack a school signature or receipt, but retrieval still returns that chunk. Cause: The material was stored before signing and sealing were completed, and filtering did not cover signature status.

How to verify the setup

Acceptance for this feature: test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle re-ranking on and off to observe the top few rankings; record the number of candidate entries and scores under searchMode, usingReRank, similarity, and limit.

Business test: access once with a restricted identity and see whether the visible scope matches the settings; record the number of citations by array length, and check the citation upper limit against the tokens of the cited text, without comparing the two for equality.

  • In the search test, switch retrieval modes, compare the candidate chunks and scores of semantic, full-text, and hybrid retrieval, and confirm that the material forms match.
  • Compare the order of the top few entries before and after enabling re-ranking, and verify whether key chunks are retained after similarity filtering and citation upper-limit truncation.