What this category's data looks like
This category's data looks like this. For external services of college admissions enrollment and filing, authorized access and traceability must be addressed first. Materials fall into three categories: enrollment plans, which include major codes, planned numbers, selected examination subjects, tuition, and school location; filing rules, which include batches, filing ratios, tie-breaking ranking, withdrawal conditions, and dates; and admission rosters, which include candidate numbers, names, filing scores, majors, admission status, and signed receipts. When these three categories of materials enter the authorized access and external service function, enrollment plans and filing rules serve as the baseline for definitions, while admission rosters serve as the basis for person-by-person verification and audit trails. Field characteristics are concentrated in four categories: names, quantities, dates, and signatures, and the update rhythm rolls forward with batch progression, supplementary volunteer collection, and plan adjustments. External entry points are matched by visitor identity and visibility scope; parents or higher-level authorities only see records within the authorized scope, and unauthorized records are not visible. Citation sources and traceability require that every external conclusion can be traced back to the original text paragraph and source identifier, facilitating subsequent field comparison, ledger writing, and report generation.
Configuration and implementation checks
Configuration and implementation checks. This step is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs an array of cited content, each item containing an original text snippet and a source identifier, and the length can be 0. "Externally available entry points and authorization scope" are subsequently completed by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Enrollment plan | Whether major codes, planned numbers, selected examination subjects, tuition, and school location align item by item with filing rules and admission rosters, and whether dates and signed receipts are complete | In the node, verify the selected knowledge base and vector model, open the citation marker, and compare against the original text paragraph and source identifier of the enrollment plan |
| Filing rules | Whether batches, filing ratios, tie-breaking ranking, withdrawal conditions, and effective dates are consistent with the admission status in the admission roster, and whether versions are synchronized | Access once with a restricted identity, check whether the visible scope matches the settings, and verify the values in the search parameter panel item by item |
| Admission roster | Whether candidate numbers, names, filing scores, majors, admission status, and signed receipts match the enrollment plan and filing rules, and whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record are consistent | Run a test with a question that has no matching materials, check that the cited content array is empty while the output chain continues, and record the number of array items |
| Cited content output | The number of returned items is consistent with the matched materials, and being empty is also normal; quoteMaxToken only constrains the cited content budget | Open the citation marker in the conversation, compare against the source document, and verify the cited snippets in responseData (non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) and quoteList |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, filing score, or major name of the same candidate does not match across two materials. Cause: The admission roster and enrollment plan versions are not synchronized, or one party did not confirm by receipt after data entry.
- Symptom: The planned number in the enrollment plan does not match the quantity corresponding to the filing ratio in the filing rules. Cause: After a plan adjustment, only one place was updated, while the other still uses the old version's date and values.
- Symptom: The external entry point can show records of unauthorized batches. Cause: Visitor identity and visibility scope were not matched according to the authorization scope, unauthorized records were not filtered, and signed receipt audit trails are missing.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: ask a question with original text support, and verify whether the cited content array and citation marker can trace back to the original text paragraph and source identifier; then ask a question with no matching materials, confirm that the array is empty while the output chain runs through, and record the number of array items and the quoteMaxToken budget separately.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity, check whether the visible scope matches the settings, that unauthorized records are not visible, and verify the cited snippets in quoteList within responseData.
- Open the search parameter panel and verify item by item, confirming that the values are consistent with those set in the knowledge base retrieval section, and verify that the vector model of the selected knowledge base is the same.
- Open the citation marker in the conversation, compare against the source document, verify the cited snippets and original text paragraphs item by item, record the number of array items, and do not compare the number of items with
quoteMaxTokenfor equality.